Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (52)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rehm, J.
Right arrow Articles by Single, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rehm, J.
Right arrow Articles by Single, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal of Epidemiology, Vol 28, 219-224, Copyright © 1999 by International Epidemiological Association


ARTICLES

Assessment methods for alcohol consumption, prevalence of high risk drinking and harm: a sensitivity analysis

J Rehm, TK Greenfield, G Walsh, X Xie, L Robson and E Single
Addiction Research Foundation, Centre for Addictions and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada.

BACKGROUND: There are no standardized ways to assess alcohol consumption in epidemiological studies. The main objective of the present study was to compare three widely used methods for assessing alcohol consumption with respect to resulting prevalence estimates for high risk drinking and harm as defined by morbidity and mortality indicators. METHODS: A within-subjects design was used to compare a quantity frequency, a graduated frequency, and a weekly drinking recall measure. Data consisted of a representative sample of 3961 adult residents of the province of Ontario, Canada, who participated in a multi-wave cross-sectional survey between 1990-1994. Cross-tabulation, Spearman correlation, and standard methodologies for prevalence-based cost-of-illness studies were used. RESULTS: The graduated frequency measure consistently yielded higher estimates of the prevalences of high risk drinking and harm. Differences were marked on all indicators, but were most pronounced for harmful drinking as defined by consuming an average of >60 g pure alcohol per day for males, and >40 g per day for females. Prevalence estimates of harmful drinking were almost five times higher for graduated frequency versus weekly drinking measures, and almost three times higher for graduated frequency versus quantity frequency measures. CONCLUSIONS: The characteristics of different measures of alcohol consumption should be considered in future research in epidemiology.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Alcohol AlcoholHome page
G. Gmel, J. Gaume, M. Faouzi, J.-P. Kulling, and J.-B. Daeppen
Who drinks most of the total alcohol in young men--risky single occasion drinking as normative behaviour
Alcohol Alcohol., August 22, 2008; (2008) agn070v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Alcohol AlcoholHome page
S. L. Clemens and S. Matthews
Comparison of a food-frequency questionnaire method and a quantity-frequency method to classify risky alcohol consumption in women
Alcohol Alcohol., March 1, 2008; 43(2): 223 - 229.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
M Bobak, R Room, H Pikhart, R Kubinova, S Malyutina, A Pajak, S Kurilovitch, R Topor, Y Nikitin, and M Marmot
Contribution of drinking patterns to differences in rates of alcohol related problems between three urban populations
J. Epidemiol. Community Health, March 1, 2004; 58(3): 238 - 242.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Alcohol AlcoholHome page
W. Chung
TYPE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE AND HIGH-RISK DRINKING: HOW RISKY IS BEER DRINKING IN KOREA?
Alcohol Alcohol., January 1, 2004; 39(1): 39 - 42.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Alcohol AlcoholHome page
K. Poikolainen, I. Podkletnova, and H. Alho
ACCURACY OF QUANTITY-FREQUENCY AND GRADUATED FREQUENCY QUESTIONNAIRES IN MEASURING ALCOHOL INTAKE: COMPARISON WITH DAILY DIARY AND COMMONLY USED LABORATORY MARKERS
Alcohol Alcohol., November 1, 2002; 37(6): 573 - 576.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
S. Kropp, H. Becher, A. Nieters, and J. Chang-Claude
Low-to-Moderate Alcohol Consumption and Breast Cancer Risk by Age 50 Years among Women in Germany
Am. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2001; 154(7): 624 - 634.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
M. C. Dufour
If You Drink Alcoholic Beverages Do So in Moderation: What Does This Mean?
J. Nutr., February 1, 2001; 131(2): 552S - 561.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
J. Rehm, T. K. Greenfield, and J. D. Rogers
Average Volume of Alcohol Consumption, Patterns of Drinking, and All-Cause Mortality: Results from the US National Alcohol Survey
Am. J. Epidemiol., January 1, 2001; 153(1): 64 - 71.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
P. Jousilahti, D. Rastenyte, and J. Tuomilehto
Serum Gamma-Glutamyl Transferase, Self-Reported Alcohol Drinking, and the Risk of Stroke
Stroke, August 1, 2000; 31(8): 1851 - 1855.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
M. Bobak, Z. Skodova, and M. Marmot
Effect of beer drinking on risk of myocardial infarction: population based case-control study
BMJ, May 20, 2000; 320(7246): 1378 - 1379.
[Full Text]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.