Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MacGowan, R. J
Right arrow Articles by Seeman, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MacGowan, R. J
Right arrow Articles by Seeman, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1998 Oxford University Press

research-article

New needle and syringe use, and use of needle exchange programmes by street recruited injection drug users in 1993

Robin J MacGowana,, Claire E Sterkb, Anna Longc, Rose Cheneyd, John E Andersona and Matt Seemana

aCenters for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta, GA, USA
bEmory University Atlanta, GA, USA
cAIDS Program Los Angeles County, CA. USA
dPhiladelphia Health Management Corporation Philadelphia, PA, USA

Reprint requests to: Robin J MacGowan, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for HIV, STD, and TB Prevention, Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd NE, Mailstop E-37, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA

BACKGROUND: Needle exchange programmes (NEP) provide injection drug users (IDU) with sterile injection equipment and receive used needles in exchange. In this paper we describe the use of new syringes and NEP by IDU and characteristics associated with using NEP in 1993.

METHODS: Street-recruited IDU were interviewed in five US locations: Atlanta, Philadelphia, Chicago, New York City, and Los Angeles (LA) county.

RESULTS: Most (75–95%) reported it was easy to get a new syringe and for their last injection, 45–77% used a new syringe and 2–18% used a syringe previously used by another IDU. Use of NEP ranged from 8% to 16% in Chicago, Philadelphia, and LA County. In LA County not having injected ‘speedball’ in the last 30 days, last injection with a new syringe, and reporting it was very easy to get a new syringe were associated with NEP use. In Philadelphia, SEP use was associated with ‘speedball’ injection in the last 30 days, and in Chicago, not injecting with ‘speedball’ and injecting with cocaine were associated with NEP use.

CONCLUSIONS: In 1993, most street-recruited IDU in Chicago, Philadelphia, and LA County had not used SEP. Factors associated with NEP use were not consistent across sites. Dispersion of NEP and removal of legal barriers restricting access to sterile syringes may be more important in increasing the use of sterile syringes and NEP than client characteristics.

Keywords Syringe, needle exchange programmes, injection drug users

Accepted 29 July 1997


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.