Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BENNETT, J.
Right arrow Articles by BORING, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by BENNETT, J.
Right arrow Articles by BORING, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1996 Oxford University Press

research-article

Bundling, a Newly Identified Risk Factor for Neonatal Tetanus: Implications for Global Control

JOHN BENNETT*, MICHAEL SCHOOLEY**, HECTOR TRAVERSO{dagger}, S BANO AGHA{ddagger} and JOHN BORING**

*The Task Force for Child Survival and Development and Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University Atlanta, GA, USA.
**Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
{dagger}UNICEF Beijing, PRC.
{ddagger}Ministry of Health Islamabad, Pakistan.

BACKGROUND: Bundling, which consists of wrapping an infant for prolonged periods in a sheepskin cover after dried cow dung is applied, is a common and apparently unique practice limited to the rural, mountainous regions of Northern Pakistan. The practice is initiated at various ages during the neonatal period. Its potential contribution to neonatal tetanus (NNT) had not been evaluated.

METHODS: A population-based, matched, case-control study was undertaken to assess bundling and other factors potentially related to NNT in rural parts of the Northern Areas, Pakistan.

RESULTS: Bundling instituted within the first 3 days of life was a substantial risk factor for NNT (odds ratio [OR] = 2.5, 95% confidence interval [Cl]: 1.3–4.9). Other factors found risky for NNT were delivery on a straw surface and pre-delivery intravaginal application of ghee to the mothers. Handwashing by the delivery attendant and use of a new razor to cut the umbilical cord were protective.

CONCLUSIONS: Bundling is a significant risk factor for NNT in the mountainous regions of Northern Pakistan. While this practice is seemingly limited to these remote areas, the findings have broad implications since they indicate that NNT can derive from exposures of the umbilical wound at any time during the first several days of life. Thus, clean cord care at delivery is not itself sufficient to prevent NNT and control programmes need to address post-delivery sources of NNT.

Keywords bundling, neonatal, tetanus, risks, sources

Revised 1 December 1995


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
L. C. Mullany, G. L. Darmstadt, J. Katz, S. K. Khatry, S. C. LeClerq, R. K. Adhikari, and J. M. Tielsch
Risk Factors for Umbilical Cord Infection among Newborns of Southern Nepal
Am. J. Epidemiol., January 15, 2007; 165(2): 203 - 211.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of HealthHome page
R. S Van Howe, J S. Svoboda, and F. M Hodges
HIV infection and circumcision: cutting through the hyperbole
The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health, November 1, 2005; 125(6): 259 - 265.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NeoReviewsHome page
J. M. Anderson and A. G.S. Philip
Management of the Umbilical Cord: Care Regimens, Colonization, Infection, and Separation
NeoReviews, April 1, 2004; 5(4): e155 - e163.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
A. Quddus, S. Luby, M. Rahbar, and Y. Pervaiz
Neonatal tetanus: mortality rate and risk factors in Loralai District, Pakistan
Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2002; 31(3): 648 - 653.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.