Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GLADEN, B. C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by GLADEN, B. C
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1996 Oxford University Press

research-article

Matched-Pair Case-Control Studies when Risk Factors are Correlated within the Pairs

BETH C GLADEN

Statistics and Biomathematics Branch, Mail Drop A3-03, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences PO Box 12233, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709. USA.

BACKGROUND: If pair members are independent, simple matched-pair case-control studies are known to yield consistent estimates of the population odds ratio. If pair members are not independent, this is not necessarily true. It has been shown previously that the usual matched-pair estimate remains consistent if the exposure of interest is correlated within the pairs. However, the effect of correlation of unmeasured risk factors within the pairs has not been studied.

METHODS: We examine the effect of within-pair correlation of unmeasured risk factors independent of the measured exposure. This is done within the context of a simple matched-pair case-control study. We compare the large-sample expectation of the usual matched-pair estimate to the population odds ratio.

RESULTS: We show that the usual estimate may be inconsistent in the presence of this correlation. However, if the disease is rare, the magnitude of the bias will be negligible.

CONCLUSIONS: Correlation of unmeasured risk factors independent of the measured exposure is not a practical problem in this setting.

Keywords bias (epidemiology), odds ratio, selection bias, epidemiological methods

Revised 1 August 1995


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Natl Cancer Inst MonogrHome page
A. M. Goldstein and N. Andrieu
Detection of Interaction Involving Identified Genes: Available Study Designs
J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, December 1, 1999; 1999(26): 49 - 54.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.