Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FIRTH, H M
Right arrow Articles by HERBISON, G P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by FIRTH, H M
Right arrow Articles by HERBISON, G P
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1996 Oxford University Press

research-article

Male Cancer Incidence by Occupation: New Zealand, 1972–1984

H M FIRTH, K R COOKE and G P HERBISON

Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Otago Medical School PO Box 913, Dunedin, New Zealand.

BACKGROUND: This study was carried out to identify male occupational groups with increased incidence of cancer for the period 1972–1984 in New Zealand. No data on cancer incidence by occupation have been reported previously for New Zealand.

METHODS: Age (SIR1) and age and socioeconomic level (SIR2) standardized incidence ratios were calculated for males 15–64 years for all cancers combined and for site-specific cancers by occupational group. Directly age standardized rates were also calculated by socioeconomic leve.

RESULTS: In general, occupations in higher socioeconomic levels had lower all-cancer incidence ratios and lower socio-economic levels had higher ratios. However, the highest socioeconomic level (level 1) had a higher all-cancer incidence rate than levels 2–6. After socioeconomic adjustment an increased incidence ratio for lung cancer was found for jewellery and precious metal workers (SIR2 = 241; 95% confidence interval [Cl] : 120–433), and bricklayers and carpenters (SIR2 = 130; 95% Cl : 116–146). Woodworkers had increased ratios for stomach (SIR2 = 144; 95% Cl : 110–186) and rectal cancer (SIR2 = 146; 95% Cl : 116–181). Firefighters had an increase for laryngeal cancer (SIR2 = 1074; 95% Cl : 279–2776).

CONCLUSIONS: Research appears to be warranted to further investigate associations of laryngeal cancer in firefighters, lung cancer in jewellery and precious metal workers and bricklayers and carpenters, and digestive cancers in woodworkers.

Keywords descriptive epidemiology, monitoring, cancer, occupational health

Revised 1 July 1995


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
L Preller, H F Balder, E Tielemans, P A van den Brandt, and R A Goldbohm
Occupational lung cancer risk among men in the Netherlands
Occup. Environ. Med., April 1, 2008; 65(4): 249 - 254.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
G Van Maele-Fabry and J L Willems
Occupation related pesticide exposure and cancer of the prostate: a meta-analysis
Occup. Environ. Med., September 1, 2003; 60(9): 634 - 642.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neuro OncolHome page
M. Wrensch, Y. Minn, T. Chew, M. Bondy, and M. S. Berger
Epidemiology of primary brain tumors: Current concepts and review of the literature
Neuro-oncol, October 1, 2002; 4(4): 278 - 299.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
N Aragones, M Pollan, and P Gustavsson
Stomach cancer and occupation in Sweden: 1971-89
Occup. Environ. Med., May 1, 2002; 59(5): 329 - 337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.