Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (23)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BENNETT, S
Right arrow Articles by TOMKINS, A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by BENNETT, S
Right arrow Articles by TOMKINS, A
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1994 Oxford University Press

other

A Computer Simulation of Household Sampling Schemes for Health Surveys in Developing Countries

S BENNETT, A RADALOWICZ*, V VELLA** and A TOMKINS{dagger}

* Tropical Health Epidemiology Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Keppel St., London WC1E 7HT, UK
** UNICEF, Uganda Country Office PO Box 7047, Kampala, Uganda
{dagger} Centre for International Child Health, Institute of Child Health 30 Guilford St., London WC1N 1EH, UK
Current address: SA3PH, The World Bank 1818 H St. NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA

BACKGROUND: Cluster sample surveys of health and nutrition in rural areas of developing countries frequently utilize the EPI (Expanded Programme on Immunization) method of selecting households where complete enumeration and systematic or simple random sampling (SRS) is considered impractical. The first household is selected by choosing a random direction from the centre of the community, counting the houses along that route, and picking one at random. Subsequent households are chosen by visiting that house which is nearest to the preceding one.

METHODS: Using a computer, and data from a survey of all children in 30 villages in Uganda, we simulated the selection of samples of size 7, 15 and 30 children from each village using SRS, the EPI method, and four different modifications of the EPI method.

RESULTS: The choice of sampling scheme for households had very little effect on the precision or bias of estimates of prevalence of malnutrition, or of recent morbidity, with EPI performing as well as SRS. However, the EPI scheme was inefficient and showed bias for variables relating to child care and for socioeconomic variables. Two of the modified EPI schemes (taking every fifth house and taking separate EPI samples in each quarter of the community) performed in general much better than EPI and almost as well as SRS.

CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the unmodified EPI household sampling scheme may be adequate for rapid appraisal of morbidity prevalence or nutritional status of communities, but that it may not be appropriate for surveys which cover a wider range of topics such as health care, or seek to examine the association of health or nutrition with explanatory factors such as education and socioeconomic status. Other factors such as cost and the ability to monitor interviewers' performance should also be taken into account.

Received 1 June 1994


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Trop Med HygHome page
J. L. Vanden Eng, A. Wolkon, A. S. Frolov, D. J. Terlouw, M. J. Eliades, K. Morgah, V. Takpa, A. Dare, Y. K. Sodahlon, Y. Doumanou, et al.
Use of Handheld Computers with Global Positioning Systems for Probability Sampling and Data Entry in Household Surveys
Am J Trop Med Hyg, August 1, 2007; 77(2): 393 - 399.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
E. T Luman, A. Worku, Y. Berhane, R. Martin, and L. Cairns
Comparison of two survey methodologies to assess vaccination coverage
Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2007; 36(3): 633 - 641.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
Z Wadud, H Kuper, S Polack, R Lindfield, M R Akm, K A Choudhury, T Lindfield, H Limburg, and A Foster
Rapid assessment of avoidable blindness and needs assessment of cataract surgical services in Satkhira District, Bangladesh
Br. J. Ophthalmol., October 1, 2006; 90(10): 1225 - 1229.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
K. Bostoen and Z. Chalabi
Optimization of household survey sampling without sample frames
Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2006; 35(3): 751 - 755.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ BehavHome page
R. C. Palmer, M. E. Fernandez, G. Tortolero-Luna, A. Gonzales, and P. D. Mullen
Correlates of Mammography Screening Among Hispanic Women Living in Lower Rio Grande Valley Farmworker Communities
Health Educ Behav, August 1, 2005; 32(4): 488 - 503.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
P. Milligan, A. Njie, and S. Bennett
Comparison of two cluster sampling methods for health surveys in developing countries
Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2004; 33(3): 469 - 476.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
S. S Morris, C. Carletto, J. Hoddinott, and L. J M Christiaensen
Validity of rapid estimates of household wealth and income for health surveys in rural Africa
J. Epidemiol. Community Health, May 1, 2000; 54(5): 381 - 387.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.