Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WOLK, A
Right arrow Articles by BERGKVIST, L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by WOLK, A
Right arrow Articles by BERGKVIST, L
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1994 Oxford University Press

research-article

Self-Administered Food Frequency Questionnaire: The Effect of Different Designs on Food and Nutrient Intake Estimates

A WOLK*, R BERGSTRÖM**,*, H-O ADAMI*,{dagger}, E-M OHLANDER{ddagger}, Å BRUCE{ddagger}, L HOLMBERG* and L BERGKVIST§

*Cancer Epidemiology Unit, University Hospital S-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden
**Department of Statistics, Uppsala University Sweden
{dagger}Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health Boston MA, USA
{ddagger}The National Food Administration Uppsala, Sweden
§The Central Hospital Västeräs Sweden

Background. Our objective was to determine the possible influence that different designs of a food frequency questionnaire might have on food, energy and nutrient intake estimates.

Methods. A population-based survey induded 6783 women, 40–70 years old, lMng in central Sweden. Using a factorial study design, we compared eight different types of questionnaire covering combinations of three factors: increasing/de creasing frequency categories; addition of portion sizes; and addition of non-dietary questions. All questionnaires included the same list of 60 food items. One of the eight questionnaires was mailed to each subject according to a random assignment. The overall response rate was 77%.

Results. Compared with Increasing frequencies, decreasing order of frequency categories entailed 3–11% higher estimates of mean intake for 7 of 14 food groups, 4% higher estimates for energy and 3–6% higher estimates for 13 of 18 nutrients. Addition of portion sizes had heterogeneous effects, both on dietary items (e.g. from -30% decrease for eggs to +76% increase for coffee) and on calculated nutrients (from -7% for beta-carotene to +19% for vitamin C). The inclusion of some additionai non-dietary questions did not influence the estimated mean intake of any food or nutrient.

Conclusion. The results of this study have implications for the design of questionnaires and for pooled analyses in nutritional epidemiology, when different food questionnaires are used.

Received 1 November 1993


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am J EpidemiolHome page
M. L. Molag, J. H. M. de Vries, M. C. Ocke, P. C. Dagnelie, P. A. van den Brandt, M. C. J. F. Jansen, W. A. van Staveren, and P. van't Veer
Design Characteristics of Food Frequency Questionnaires in Relation to Their Validity
Am. J. Epidemiol., December 15, 2007; 166(12): 1468 - 1478.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.