Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bouyer, J.
Right arrow Articles by Hemon, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bouyer, J.
Right arrow Articles by Hemon, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal of Epidemiology, Vol 22, S65-S71, Copyright © 1993 by International Epidemiological Association


ARTICLES

Studying the performance of a job exposure matrix

J Bouyer and D Hemon
Department of Epidemiological and Statistical Research on Environment and Health, INSERM U.170, Villejuif, France.

During the last decade, the use of job exposure matrices (JEM) in occupational studies has grown but uncertainty remains among epidemiologists and industrial hygienists regarding this methodology and appropriate methodological tools are needed to study the performance of JEM. It must first be emphasized that a true validation can rarely be achieved and that the performance of a JEM must be tested against the exposure evaluation of another method taken as a reference, such as expert assessment. This comparison comprises three main elements: the ability of the JEM to evaluate accurately the exposure itself, its statistical performances in terms of bias and power and its ability to detect known associations between risk factors and disease. When comparing JEM and experts, all aspects of the two methods have to be looked at and a balance struck between the advantages and shortcomings of each of them. The problem should not be reduced to a trade-off between the precision provided by experts and the cost savings possible by using JEM. Finally, it is important to avoid a systematic opposition between JEM and expert assessments, as one positive result of their comparison may be the improvement of both methods of exposure evaluation.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
M.-C. Rousseau, M.-E. Parent, L. Nadon, B. Latreille, and J. Siemiatycki
Occupational Exposure to Lead Compounds and Risk of Cancer among Men: A Population-based Case-Control Study
Am. J. Epidemiol., November 1, 2007; 166(9): 1005 - 1014.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
G. ASTRAKIANAKIS, N. S. SEIXAS, J. E. CAMP, D. C. CHRISTIANI, Z. FENG, D. B. THOMAS, and H. CHECKOWAY
Modeling, Estimation and Validation of Cotton Dust and Endotoxin Exposures in Chinese Textile Operations
Ann. Hyg., August 1, 2006; 50(6): 573 - 582.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
M P A Zeegers, G M H Swaen, I Kant, R A Goldbohm, and P A van den Brandt
Occupational risk factors for male bladder cancer: results from a population based case cohort study in the Netherlands
Occup. Environ. Med., September 1, 2001; 58(9): 590 - 596.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
S. M Kennedy, N. Le Moual, D. Choudat, and F. Kauffmann
Development of an asthma specific job exposure matrix and its application in the epidemiological study of genetics and environment in asthma (EGEA)
Occup. Environ. Med., September 1, 2000; 57(9): 635 - 641.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
N Le Moual, P Bakke, E Orlowski, D Heederik, H Kromhout, S M Kennedy, B Rijcken, and F Kauffmann
Performance of population specific job exposure matrices (JEMs): European collaborative analyses on occupational risk factors for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with job exposure matrices (ECOJEM)
Occup. Environ. Med., February 1, 2000; 57(2): 126 - 132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.