Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (76)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MARGETTS, B M
Right arrow Articles by OSMOND, C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MARGETTS, B M
Right arrow Articles by OSMOND, C
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1989 Oxford University Press

research-article

Comparison of a Food Frequency Questionnaire with a Diet Record

B M MARGETTS*,, J E CADE** and C OSMOND*

*MRC Environmental Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital Southampton SO9 4XY, UK.
**Department of Community Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital Southampton SO9 4XY, UK.

Correspondence to Dr B M Margetts.

Margetts B M (MRC Environmental Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton SO9 4XY, UK), Cade J E and Osmond C. Comparison of a food frequency questionnaire with a diet record. International Journal of Epidemiology 1989, 18: 868–873.

The associations between levels of nutrients derived from a 24-hour diet record and a food frequency questionnaire were assessed in a sample of 433 men and women. The food frequency questionnaire was administered three years after the completion of the diet record. Spearman correlations were all statistically significant; they varied from 0.36 for energy to 0.15 for vitamin A. Comparison of distributions into fifths showed few people grossly misclassified. A model was developed to assess the correlations which would be expected under various conditions of within and between subject variance for each nutrient, errors in measurements and drift in intake over time. The best possible correlation that could be obtained using the within and between subject variations in intake previously published, and with no measurement error or drift over time, was 0.60 for energy and 0.34 for vitamin A. Using a realistic measure of measurement error (standard deviation on log scale of 0.12 for diet record method, 0.06 for drift over time and 0.18 for food frequency method) the correlations obtained in the modelling were very similar to that observed. This study shows that it may be appropriate to use a food frequency questionnaire instead of a diet record to estimate intakes in population based epidemiological studies.

Revised 1 April 1989


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ther Adv Cardiovasc DisHome page
K. L. Jablonski, P. E. Gates, G. L. Pierce, and D. R. Seals
Low dietary sodium intake is associated with enhanced vascular endothelial function in middle-aged and older adults with elevated systolic blood pressure
Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease, October 1, 2009; 3(5): 347 - 356.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Health PsycholHome page
C. J. Armitage and M. A. Arden
Felt and Potential Ambivalence across the Stages of Change
J Health Psychol, January 1, 2007; 12(1): 149 - 158.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
S. A. Wudy, S. Hagemann, A. Dempfle, G. Ringler, W. F. Blum, L. D. Berthold, G. Alzen, L. Gortner, and J. Hebebrand
Children With Idiopathic Short Stature Are Poor Eaters and Have Decreased Body Mass Index
Pediatrics, July 1, 2005; 116(1): e52 - e57.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
K Godfrey, S Robinson, D. Barker, C Osmond, and V Cox
Maternal nutrition in early and late pregnancy in relation to placental and fetal growth
BMJ, February 17, 1996; 312(7028): 410 - 410.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.