Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (20)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MUSHTAQUE, A
Right arrow Articles by ABED, F H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MUSHTAQUE, A
Right arrow Articles by ABED, F H
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1988 Oxford University Press

research-article

Use and Safety of Home-Made Oral Rehydration Solutions: An Epidemiological Evaluation from Bangladesh

A MUSHTAQUE, R CHOWDHURY*, J PATRICK VAUGHAN{dagger},1 and F H ABED*

*Bangladesh Rural Advancement Committee (BRAC) 66 Mohakhali C/A, Dhaka 12, Bangladesh
{dagger}Evaluation and Planning Centre for Health Care, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine London WC1E 7HT.

1Reprint requests to: Dr J P Vaughan, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1 7HT, UK.

Home-made oral rehydration solutions (ORS) have been promoted In developing countries for preventing dehydration due to diarrhoea. Evaluations of this method must take into account the effective usage rates achieved and the safety of the solutions used. A community programme organized by the Bangladesh Rural Advancement Committee (BRAC) has visited over a third of all the households in Bangladesh and taught the preparation and use of an oral rehydration solution made from lobon (common salt) and gur (unrefined sugar)—abbreviated to LGS. An evaluation study based on over 7000 households enabled different usage rates to be calculated for four different diarrhoea types. The overall usage of LGS for all diarrhoea episodes was around 5–10% but for what the people called ‘Severe Diarrhoeas’ or cholera it was found to be between 25% and 52%. The mother's ability to prepare a safe Lobon-gur solution appeared to deteriorate about six months after training and it was significantly poorer in the Second Phase than the First Phase of the BRAC programme.

Revised 1 September 1987


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.