Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by EISEN, E A
Right arrow Articles by ROBINS, J M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by EISEN, E A
Right arrow Articles by ROBINS, J M
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1986 Oxford University Press

research-article

Estimation of Ventilatory Capacity in Subjects with Unacceptable Lung Function Tests

E A EISEN and J M ROBINS

Harvard School of Public Healih Boston MA 02115, USA.

Based on pulmonary function data collected annually for six years on 540 Vermont granite workers, FEV1 in survey 1 was estimated by extrapolating back from subsequent measurements. The extrapolation method was found to fit the observed data of subjects with reproducible initial values very well (R2==0.87). Extrapolated FEV1S for workers unable toperform an adequate pulmonary function test according to the standards of the American Thoracic Society were compared to extrapolated values in the rest of the cohort. After adjusting for confounding, subjects with test failure in survey 1 had a lower extrapolated FEV1 than the rest of the cohort (p = 0.07). The mean extrapolated FEV1 of the 71 workers with an initial test failure was only 95% of a predicted value derived from the group with reproducible data, and the per cent predicted decreased from 98% to 71% as the number of test failures in the follow-up surveys increased (p = 0.0004). The American Thoracic Society and the Epidemiology Standardization Project currently recommend that test failures be excluded from the analysis of epidemiological data. Our findings suggest that alternative strategies for handling non-reproducible lung function may need to be explored in order to avoid selection bias.

Received 1 June 1985


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
H Chaudemanche, E Monnet, V Westeel, D Pernet, A Dubiez, C Perrin, J-J Laplante, A Depierre, and J-C Dalphin
Respiratory status in dairy farmers in France; cross sectional and longitudinal analyses
Occup. Environ. Med., November 1, 2003; 60(11): 858 - 863.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
P. R. BREMNER, N. H. de KLERK, G. F. RYAN, A. L. JAMES, M. MUSK, C. MURRAY, P. N. LE SOUEF, S. YOUNG, R. SPARGO, and A. WILLIAM MUSK
Respiratory Symptoms and Lung Function in Aborigines from Tropical Western Australia
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., December 1, 1998; 158(6): 1724 - 1729.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.