Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FOLSOM, A. R
Right arrow Articles by GILLUM, R. F
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by FOLSOM, A. R
Right arrow Articles by GILLUM, R. F
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1984 Oxford University Press

research-article

Measured Differences between Fourth and Fifth Phase Diastolic Blood Pressures in 4885 Adults: Implications for Blood Pressure Surveys

AARON R FOLSOM, RONALD J PRINEAS, DAVID R JACOBS, RUSSELL V LUEPKER and RICHARD F GILLUM

Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Stadium Gate 20, 611 Beacon StreetSE, University of Minnesota Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA

Folsom A R (Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Stadium Gate 20, 611 Beacon Street SE, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA), Prineas R J, Jacobs D R, Luepker R V and Gillum R F. Measured differences between fourth and fifth phase diastolic blood pressures in 4885 adults: Implications for blood pressure surveys. International Journal of Epidemiology 1984, 13: 436–441.

To examine in detail the relationship between fourth (D4) and fifth (D5) phase diastolic blood pressures, we used data from risk factor surveys of 4885 adults. Observers were carefully trained using audio tapes and double-stethoscope exams to record the onset of the first, fourth (muffling), and fifth (disappearance) phases of Korotkoff sounds with random-zero sphygmomanometers. The expected size of the difference between D4 and D5 pressures (D4-D5) was not discussed with observers.

D4-D5 was greater (mean± SEM)in men (2.4±0.1 mmHg) than in women (1.9 ±0.1 mmHg), but two thirds of D4-D5s were not measurable, that is, 0 mmHg. Larger D4-D5s were associated with higher systolic and D4 levels, lower D5 levels, and younger ages. D4-D5 varied markedly among observers. Approximately 58% of D4-D5s exceeding 10 mmHg occurred among six observers who measured 16% of the blood pressures. However, generally the difference between D4 and D5 measured by our observers and methods was smaller than commonly believed. The possible reasons for this are discussed. We recommend that epidemiological studies measure and report both diastolic readings (D4 and D5) so that their interrelationship may be studied further in other populations.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.