Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KLEINMAN, J. C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by KLEINMAN, J. C
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1982 Oxford University Press

research-article

Indirect Standardization of Neonatal Mortality for Birth Weight

JOEL C KLEINMAN*

*Director, Division of Analysis, National Center for the Health Statistics, 3700 East West Highway, Hyattsville, Maryland 20782, USA.

Kleinman J C (Division of Analysis, National Center for Health Statistics, 3700 East West Highway, Hyattsville, MD 20782, USA). Indirect standardization of neonatal mortality for birth weight. International Journal of Epidemiology 1982, 11: 146–154.

Recent advances in perinatal medicine, together with the proliferation of regionalized perinatal networks, have increased the need for monitoring of trends and variations in birth weight–specific perinatal mortality rates. Since the United States has no national system of linked birth and death records, the only available method for comparing weight–specific mortality among geographic areas or medical care facilities is through indirect standardization of mortality for birth weight. This paper investigates the characteristics of the Standardized Mortality Ratio (SMR) obtained by indirect standardization using 1974–77 neonatal mortality and birth weight data for 202 geographic areas across the United States.

The results show that the SMR is not sensitive to the choice of standard rates even when the areas birth weight–specific mortality rates are not a constant multiple of the standard rates. A method for estimating the standard error of the SMR without knowledge of the weight–specific rates is presented and shown to be nearly unbiased. There is also a substantial amount of variation among geographic areas in both neonatal mortality rates, SMRs, and birth weight distributions. Thus, despite certain limitations, the SMR provides a useful summary measure for monitoring trends and variations among geographic areas or medical care facilities in birth outcomes.

Revised 5 October 1981


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.