© 1972 Oxford University Press
other |
A Quantitative Approach to the World Health Organization Definition of Health: Physical, Mental and Social Well-being*
1 Dean, School of Public Health, University of California at Los Angeles Los Angeles, California 90024, U.S.A.
Our concept and measurement of health has generally focused on ill health. This focus on pathology probably arose from the fact that for most of human existence the health problem facing society, and medicine in particular, has been overcoming disease. By mid-twentieth century, however, already for some of mankind and hopefully soon for the rest, the health picture had changed—people as a whole were not disease-ridden and ideas of so-called positive health emerged. This emboldened the WHO to define health in a new way as ‘physical, mental and social well-being, not merely the absence of disease or infirmity’.
To absorb this concept and use it in medical science has not been easy for those trained to approach health through pathology. The Human Population Laboratory of Alameda County, California, have been trying to apply the WHO idea in the measurement of health and in ascertaining how to improve health. This paper discusses the various aspects of and approaches to this subject and describes a trial of their method of measurement and the preparations for another survey in 1973.
For an individual or a community it appears possible to measure health status through questions that only individuals can answer about themselves, as in the Human Population Laboratory, and through testing by physical means the extent of functional reserves, as in multiphasic screening. Medicine would then focus on improving health in the sense of (i) moving people toward the favorable end of the health spectrum, as determined subjectively by responses to questions, and (ii) enhancing the bodily reserves, as determined by screening tests.
Received 27 October 1972
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. J Oswald Commentary: Human well-being and causality in social epidemiology Int. J. Epidemiol., December 1, 2007; 36(6): 1253 - 1254. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Mandelblatt, C. Armetta, K. R. Yabroff, W. Liang, and W. Lawrence Descriptive Review of the Literature on Breast Cancer Outcomes: 1990 Through 2000 J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, October 1, 2004; 2004(33): 8 - 44. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H.A. Llewellyn-Thomas, H.J. Sutherland, D.L. Tritchler, G.A. Lockwood, J.E. Till, A. Ciampi, J.F. Scott, L.A. Lickley, and E.B. Fish Benign and Malignant Breast Disease: The Relationship between Women's Health Status and Health Values Med Decis Making, August 1, 1991; 11(3): 180 - 188. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. J. Kronenfeld, K. Jackson, S. N. Blair, K. Davis, J. Dell Gimarc, Z. Salisbury, D. Maysey, and J. G. McGee Evaluating Health Promotion: A Longitudinal Quasi-Experimental Design Health Educ Behav, January 1, 1987; 14(2): 123 - 139. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B.K. Tones Health Education: prevention or subversion? The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health, June 1, 1981; 101(3): 114 - 117.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. Gori and B. Richter Macroeconomics of disease prevention in the United States Science, June 9, 1978; 200(4346): 1124 - 1130. [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A Donabedian The quality of medical care Science, May 26, 1978; 200(4344): 856 - 864. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L Breslow Risk factor intervention for health maintenance Science, May 26, 1978; 200(4344): 908 - 912. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|