Skip Navigation

Right arrow Return to article


Table 4 Summary of estimates of risk for congenital anomalies associated with Agent Orange exposure in Vietnam war

Measure of heterogeneity

Subgroup Number of studies Summary OR or RR (95% CI) Q-value P-value I2 Analysis model

All studies 22 1.95 (1.59–2.39) 163.0 <0.0001 0.87 RE
Study design

    Cohort 16 2.16 (1.68–2.76) 119.0 <0.0001 0.87 RE
    Case–control 5 1.40 (0.95–2.06) 20.0 <0.0001 0.80 RE
    Cross-sectional 1 3.00 (2.02–4.47) NA NA NA NA
Study population

    Vietnamese

        Cohort 10 3.11 (2.11–4.61) 50.26 <0.0001 0.82 RE
        Case–control 2 3.55 (2.06–6.14) 0.00 0.965 . FE
        Cross-sectional 1 1.97 (1.31–2.96) NA NA NA NA
        Total 13 3.00 (2.19–4.12) 54.6 <0.0001 0.78 RE
    International veterans

        Cohort 6 1.45 (1.07–1.96) 45.63 <0.0001 0.89 RE
        Case–control 3 0.99 (0.87–1.13) 0.3 0.8607 0.00 FE
        Total 9 1.29 (1.04–1.59) 55.0 <0.0001 0.85 RE
        Total (Lathrop22 removed) 8 1.28 (1.02–1.61) 53.5 <0.0001 0.87 RE
Exposure

    International non-Ranch Hand veteransa 6 1.04 (0.93–1.16) 5.14 0.273 0.03 FE
    Ranch Hand veteransb 3 1.20 (1.08–1.34) 2.559 0.278 0.46 FE
    Ranch Hand veteransb (Lathrop22 removed) 2 1.18 (1.05–1.32) 1.688 0.194 0.41 FE
    North Vietnam veteransb 7 2.61 (1.72–3.95) 29.82 <0.0001 0.80 RE
    North Vietnam veteransb (Can et al.31 removed) 6 2.75 (2.17–3.49) 8.32 0.1395 0.40 FE
    Sprayed civiliansc 6 3.27 (2.54–4.10) 5.41 0.3679 0.08 FE

RE: Random-effects model; FE: fixed-effects model; I 2: Index of inconsistency.

aNo or minimal exposure.

bFather exposed.

cBoth parents exposed.





Right arrow Return to article