Skip Navigation


IJE Advance Access originally published online on October 21, 2005
International Journal of Epidemiology 2006 35(2):266-269; doi:10.1093/ije/dyi209
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
35/2/266    most recent
dyi209v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brookes, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brookes, V.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association © The Author 2005; all rights reserved.

Photoessay

Welfare in Lancashire cotton mills in the 1940s

Victoria Brookes

Research Associate, Academic Urology, University of Sheffield, UK

Email: Victoria.Brookes{at}uhb.nhs.uk

During the Second World War, with the loss of male labour to the armed forces, there was great demand for women to fill the vacancies in Britain's manufacturing industries. However absenteeism proved a particular problem, with absence rates for women being twice as high as those for men.1 This affected production to the extent that an inquiry was launched by the Medical Research Council in 1945, which identified not only working conditions but also the double burden of family responsibilities as major contributing factors.2

The shortage of men was especially acute in the Lancashire cotton industry both during and following the war, with the additional movement of operatives to industries offering better pay and working conditions.3 The subsequent employment of large numbers of married women and mothers resulted in high female absentee rates in the mills, as women attempted to cope with the strain of their working duties while trying to care for and feed their children. Although Britain's cotton industry had a long association with poor working conditions and employer apathy towards factory welfare, some businesses, with the encouragement of the government and local authority schemes, did establish their own childcare facilities and factory canteens during the 1940s as they began to realize the importance of such amenities in facilitating recruitment, reducing illness, exhaustion, and absenteeism, and increasing productivity.4

The photographs featured here, which I used in my PhD thesis,5 form part of the Audrey Lambert Photographic Collection at Greater Manchester County Records Office and are reproduced with their permission. Many of the photographs were collected as part of the Manchester Oral History Collection held at Tameside Local Studies Library, Stalybridge. The collection is made up of taped interviews with local people conducted in the 1970s, many of whom also donated images of their working lives.


Figure 1
View larger version (110K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
A nurse cares for the babies of employees in the nursery at Cromer Mill in Middleton during the 1940s. (Greater Manchester County Record Office, Audrey Lambert Photographic Collection, photo 871/5.)

 

Figure 2
View larger version (98K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Children at Cromer Mill in Middleton dance to the piano in the nursery during the 1940s. (Greater Manchester County Record Office, Audrey Lambert Photographic Collection, photo 871/7.)

 

Figure 3
View larger version (95K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Children wear overalls as they eat in the nursery dining room at Cromer Mill in Middleton during the 1940s. (Greater Manchester County Record Office, Audrey Lambert Photographic Collection, photo 871/6.)

 

Figure 4
View larger version (97K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
The canteen at the Elm Mill in Lees during the late 1930s/early 1940s. Many mill canteens in the Oldham district would also cater for the children of employees. (Greater Manchester County Record Office, Audrey Lambert Photographic Collection, photo 898/3.)

 

Figure 5
View larger version (86K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Children play on the outdoor equipment of the nursery at Cromer Mill in Middleton during the 1940s. (Greater Manchester County Record Office, Audrey Lambert Photographic Collection, photo 871/8.)

 

    References
 Top
 References
 
1 Jones H. Health and Society in Twentieth-Century Britain. Longman: London, 1994, pp. 107–08.

2 Industrial Health Research Board. Why is She Away? The Problem of Sickness Among Women in Industry, Pamphlet 3. London: Medical Research Council, 1945.

3 John Rylands University Library, Oldham Master Cotton Spinners Association, OLD/2/23/5/2-3, Juvenile Labour 1937. Oldham Education Committee Report, 1941, Appendix IV; OLD/2/23/5/1, Juvenile Labour 1937. Letter from Ministry of Juvenile Labour to Maple Mill LTD 1938.

4 John Rylands University Library, Oldham Master Cotton Spinners Association, OLD/2/23/1/2 Playcentres, 1949–50. ‘Summary of Replies to Questionnaire on Playcentres for School Children, April 1949’, individual mill returns for Oldham district, and letter from the Ministry of Labour to Oldham Master Cotton Spinners' Association urging employers to support playcentre schemes for children during school vacations, 14 November 1949; OLD/2/23/2/1-3 Returns of questionnaires issued to mills by the Oldham Master Cotton Spinners' Association, 20 April 1949 re: Labour Shortages, June 1949; OLD/2/23/1/1 School Meals, 1948. ‘Provision of School Meals for Operatives’ Children' n.d; National Archives, Ministry Of Labour, LAB/12/523 Recruitment of Labour for the Cotton Industry: Campaign Strategy, 1948. Survey of Cotton Mills.

5 Brookes V. Gender, class and identity: cotton workers in Bolton and Oldham, 1920–1950. PhD thesis, University of Manchester, 2005.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
35/2/266    most recent
dyi209v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brookes, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brookes, V.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?