Editor's Choice |
Cultural climate, physical climate, life, and death
When processing manuscripts submitted to the IJE it is sometimes possible to get the sense that epidemiology majors in rediscovering the already discovered. Recognizing the importance of replication (but perhaps not 1000 times?) and of tightening confidence intervals around effect estimates in meta-analyses can help deal with these longeurs, but this does not really counterbalance the pulse-slowing effect of me-too research. The current issue of the IJE is an antidote to such malign thoughts, with very few (no names, no pack drill) examples of the truly mundane. As with other recent debates, reviews, and commentaries123in the IJE the focus in this issue is very much on exposures experienced collectively, rather than on individual-level risk factor epidemiology. The effect of climate on health is the focus of our reprint and reflections and several of our original papers. In 1980 the IJE published the first major hypothesis paper on the apparent protective effect of sunlight on colon cancer, which we reprint in this issue.24 Based on the simple use of routine data Cedric and Frank Garland showed that within the US there was an inverse association between sunlight and colon cancer mortality and hypothesized that this was due to a protective effect of vitamin D on colon cancer. Since then, as our commentators discuss,15,2529 much further research has been carried out on the vitamin Dcolon cancer link, and a major contributor to this literature, Edward Giovannucci, concludes that the evidence is fairly compelling that sunlight and vitamin D are protective.30 One of the original authors, together with colleagues, now expands the hypothesis to suggest that sunlight and vitamin D have protective effects on various cancers, and mechanisms for the protective effects are discussed by Heide Cross.27
Climate is seen as a less salubrious exposure by Cheng et al.,31 who show that extreme weather events in northern Australia are linked to clusters of melioidosis caused by pathogens with diverse DNA patterns. Jordi Sunyer and Joan Grimalt suggest that globally the influence of climate change will be to increase health inequalities between rich and poor nations and rich and poor people.32 But what about the long-term health consequences of climate during the intrauterine period and birth? Although there has been discussion of this for nearly a century, the study by Sophie Moore et al.33 from the Gambia showing increased mortality risk across life in those born during the wet season, rekindled interest in this area and led to speculation about possible immune system modulation as the mechanism. Using data from Burkina Faso, Gisela Kynast-Wolf et al.34 fail to replicate this finding and in her commentary Sophie Moore35 reviews current thinking about this issue.
We can easily recognize that the physical climate could be beneficial or detrimental to health, but what about the cultural climate? Initiating a lively exchange in this issue's Point-Counterpoint Richard Eckersley36 argues that materialism and individualism are important (negative) influences on population health, and a form of cultural fraud, whereby images of a lifestyle detrimental to the health of populations and individuals are promoted to serve the economic needs of business, but not the real needs of people. None of our commentators3739 disagree with Eckersley's basic position, but they raise issues regarding the appropriate domain of the concept of culture. The exchange highlights the tensions and promise of interdisciplinary research, and, as Eckersley points out, the challenge here is considerable. In interdisciplinary work, he suggests, sometimes key issues may not be agreed upon, indeed it may not be possible to agree on how we disagree.40
Jeremy Kark et al.41 explore the reason for the considerably higher coronary heart disease incidence among Palestinians than among Israelis living in Jerusalem. For coronary deaths the differential was even greater, and these findings will clearly lead to much speculation about the underlying factors. Finally, Laura Jackson et al.42 investigate the potential of a macro-level interventionlandscape designin reducing Lyme disease risk.
Alexander Trocchi (19251984), an enthusiastic participant of what used to be called subcultures,43 provides a different take on issues of cultural difference in his geography lesson for his sons and daughters.44 Trocchi, a Scottish novelist and poet, is best known for Cain's Book (1963), a fictionalized account of his life as a heroin user in New York in the mid-20th century, and he was perhaps the first person to demonstrate mainlining on live television. His essay The invisible insurrection of a million minds was much admired by the Situationists' guru Guy Debord, but not enough to prevent him expelling Trocchi from the Situationist International.
References
1 Tapia Granados JA. Increasing mortality during the expansions of the US economy, 1900. Int J Epidemiol 2005;34:1194202.
2 McKee M, Suhrcke M. Commentary: Health and economic transition Int J Epidemiol 2005;34:120306.
3 Ruhm CJ Commentary: Mortality increases during economic upturns Int J Epidemiol 2005;34:120611.
4 Catalano R, Bellows B. Commentary: If economic expansion threatens public health, should epidemiologists recommend recession? Int J Epidemiol 2005;34:121213.
5 Brenner MH. Commentary: Economic growth is the basis of mortality rate decline in the 20th century? Experience of the United States 1901? Int J Epidemiol 2005;34:121421.
6 Neumayer N. Commentary: The economic business cycle and mortality Int J Epidemiol 2005;34:122122.
7 Edwards RD. Commentary: Work, wellbeing, and a new calling for countercyclical policy Int J Epidemiol 2005;34:122225.
8 Tapia Granados JA. Response: On economic growth, business fluctuations, and health progress Int J Epidemiol 2005;34:122633.
9 Ben-Shlomo Y. Real epidemiologists don't do ecological studies? Int J Epidemiol 2005;34:118182.
10 Pearce N. The globalization of epidemiology: introductory remarks. Int J Epidemiol 2004;33:112731.
11 Barreto ML. The globalization of epidemiology: critical thoughts from Latin America Int J Epidemiol 2004;33:113237.
12 Durie M. Understanding health and illness: research at the interface between science and indigenous knowledge. Int J Epidemiol 2004;33:113843.
13 Loewenson R. Epidemiology in the era of globalization: skills transfer or new skills? Int J Epidemiol 2004;33:114450.
14 Putnam RD. Commentary: Health by association: some comments. Int J Epidemiol 2004;33:66771.
15 Navarro V. Commentary: Is capital the solution or the problem? Int J Epidemiol 2004;33:67274.
16 Muntaner C. Commentary: Social capital, social class, and the slow progress of psychosocial epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol 2004;33:67480.
17 Ellaway A. Commentary: Can subtle refinements of popular concepts be put into practice? Int J Epidemiol 2004;33:68182.
18 Kawachi I, Kim D, Coutts A, Subramanian SV. Commentary: Reconciling the three accounts of social capital. Int J Epidemiol 2004;33:68290.
19 Davey Smith G, Lynch J. Commentary: Social capital, social epidemiology and disease aetiology. Int J Epidemiol 2004;33:691700.
20 Szreter S, Woolcock M. Rejoinder: Crafting rigorous and relevant social theory for public health policy Int J Epidemiol 2004;33:70004.
21 Szreter S. Author response: Debating mortality trends in 19th century Britain. Int J Epidemiol 2004;33:70509.
22 Marmot M. Commentary: Risk factors or social causes? Int J Epidemiol 2004;33:29798.
23 Lawlor DA. Commentary: The art and science of epidemiology: governed by the seasons? Int J Epidemiol 2004;33:14446.
24 Garland CF, Garland FC. Do sunlight and vitamin D reduce the likelihood of colon cancer? Int J Epidemiol 1980;9:22731. (Reprinted Int J Epidemiol 2006;35:21720.)
25 Garland CF, Garland FC. Commentary: Progress of a paradigm. Int J Epidemiol 2006;35:22022.
26 Grant WB, Gorham ED. Commentary: Time for public health action on vitamin D for cancer risk reduction. Int J Epidemiol 2006;35:22425.
27 Cross HS. Commentary: From epidemiology to molecular biologyvitamin D and colorectal cancer prevention. Int J Epidemiol 2006;35:22527.
28 Egan KM. Commentary: Sunlight, vitamin D, and the cancer connection revisited Int J Epidemiol 2006;35:22730.
29 Armstrong BK. Commentary: Seeing the light. Int J Epidemiol 2006;35:23132.
30 Giovannucci E. Commentary: Vitamin D and colorectal cancertwenty-five years later Int J Epidemiol 2006;35:22224.
31 Cheng AC, Jacups SP, Gal D, Mayo M, Currie BJ. Extreme weather events and environmental contamination are associated with out breaks of meioidosis in Northern Australia. Int J Epidemiol 2006;35:32329.
32 Sunyer J, Grimalt J. Editorial Global climate change, widening health inequalities and epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol 2006;35:21316.
33 Moore SE, Cole TJ, Poskitt EME et al. Season of birth predicts mortality in rural Gambia. Nature 1997;388:434.[CrossRef][Medline]
34 Kynast-Wolf G, Hammer GP, Müller O, Kouyaté B, Becher H. Season of death and birth predict patterns of mortality in Burkina Faso. Int J Epidemiol 2006;35:42735.
35 Moore SE. Commentary: Patterns in mortality governed by the seasons. Int J Epidemiol 2006;35:43537.
36 Eckersley R. Point-Counterpoint: Is modern western culture a health hazard? Int J Epidemiol 2006;35:25258.
37 Glass TA. Commentary: Culture in epidemiologythe 800 pound gorilla? Int J Epidemiol 2006;35:25961.
38 Dressler WW. Commentary: Taking culture seriously in health research. Int J Epidemiol 2006;35:25859.
39 Janes CR. Commentary: Culture, cultural explanations and causality. Int J Epidemiol 2006;35:26163.
40 Eckersley R. Author's response: Culture can be studied at both large and small scales. Int J Epidemiol 2006;35:26365.
41 Kark JD, Fink R, Adler B, Goldberger N, Goldman S. The incidence of coronary heart disease among Palestinians and Israelis in Jerusalem. Int J Epidemiol 2006;35:44857.
42 Jackson LE, Hilborn ED, Thomas JC. Towards landscape design guidelines for reducing Lyme disease risk. Int J Epidemiol 2006;35:31522.
43 Hebdige D. Subculture the Meaning of Style. London: Methuen, 1979.
44 Trocchi A. A little geography lesson for my sons and daughters. Int J Epidemiol 2006;35:25051.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||