Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Katan, M. B
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Katan, M. B
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal of Epidemiology, Volume 33, Number 1, pp. 9
IJE vol.33 no.1 © International Epidemiological Association 2004; all rights reserved.


Reprints and Reflections

Apolipoprotein E isoforms, serum cholesterol, and cancer

Martjin B Katan

Department of Human Nutrition, Agricultural University, 6703 BC Wageningen, The Netherlands

SIR,—It is unclear whether the relation between low serum cholesterol levels and cancer1 is causal. In many studies occult tumour may have depressed cholesterol levels though in others the relation was found when serum cholesterol had been measured many years before the cancer was diagnosed. The relation is probably not explained by diet, because in the Seven Countries Study cohorts with widely different diets and corresponding differences in mean cholesterol levels experienced similar mean cancer rates.2,3 On the other hand, within each region cancer incidence was higher in men with a serum cholesterol in the lowest part of the cholesterol distribution for that country.3 Thus, naturally low cholesterol levels are sometimes associated with increased cancer risk.1,3

Differences in the aminoacid sequence of apolipoprotein E (apo E) are major determinants of differences in plasma cholesterol levels within a population. Apo E has a key role in the clearance of cholesterol from plasma.4 The synthesis of apo E is under the control of three independent alleles, located at a single gene locus, coding for the major isoforms E-2, E-3, and E-4 with respective population frequencies of about 8, 77, and 15%.5 The homozygous E-3/E-3 is the most common phenotype encountered and E-2/E-2 is the least common. From apo E-2 to apo E-3, one cysteine residue is replaced by arginine, and from apo E-3 to apo E-4 another cysteine residue is replaced. As a result the avidity of apo E containing lipoproteins for lipoprotein receptors increases from apo E-2 to apo E-3 to apo E-4. In several populations,6–8 including the Finns and the Japanese (Dr G Utermann, personal communication), the gradient in serum cholesterol levels in the population is associated with a gradient in apo E phenotype, E-2 being associated with lower serum low-density lipoprotein and total cholesterol levels than E-3 and E-4. Thus, if a naturally low cholesterol favours tumour growth, then subjects with the E-2/E-2 or E-2/E-3 phenotype should have an increased risk of cancer.

Unlike most other indices of lipid metabolism, apolipoprotein aminoacid sequences are not disturbed by disease, and the apo E phenotype found in a patient will have been present since birth. A comparison of apo E phenotypes in cancer patients with those in matched controls might thus shed light on the relation between low cholesterol and cancer. If it is causal then the E-2 allele should be more common among patients and E-3 and E-4 more common among controls. On the other hand, equal distribution of apo E phenotypes among cases and controls would suggest that the association between low cholesterol and cancer is spurious. Measurement of apo E phenotype by isoelectric focusing of plasma is a routine determination in lipid laboratories; epidemiologists interested in cholesterol and cancer should include it in their studies.


    Notes
 
First published in the Lancet 1986;i:507–08.

Reprinted with permission.


    References
 Top
 References
 
1 McMichael AJ, Jensen OM, Parkin DM, Zaridze DG. Dietary and endogenous cholesterol and human cancer. Epidemiol Rev 1984;6:192–216.[Free Full Text]

2 Keys A, Aravanis C, Blackburn H et al. Serum cholesterol and cancer mortality in the seven countries study. Am J Epidemiol 1985;121:870–83.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3 Katan MB. Effects of cholesterol-lowering diets on the risk for cancer and other non-cardiovascular diseases. In: Nestel PJ et al. eds. Atherosclerosis VII: Proceedings of the Seventh International Atherosclerosis Symposium. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1986.

4 Brown MS, Kovanen PT, Goldstein JL. Regulation of plasma cholesterol by lipoprotein receptors. Science 1981;212:628–35.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5 Utermann G, Steinmetz A, Weber W. Genetic control of human apolipoprotein E polymorphism: comparison of one- and two- dimensional techniques of isoprotein analysis. Hum Genet 1982;60:344–51.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

6 Utermann G, Kindermann I, Kaffarnik H, Steinmetz A. Apolipoprotein E phenotypes and hyperlipidemia. Hum Genet 1984;65:232–36.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

7 Robertson FW, Cumming AM. Effects of Apoprotein E Polymorphism on Serum Lipoprotein Concentration. Arteriosclerosis 1985;5:283–92.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8 Utermann G. Genetic polymorphism of apolipoprotein E: impact on plasma lipoprotein metabolism. In: Crepaldi G et al. eds. Diabetes, obesity and hyperlipidemias III. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1985:1–28.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
G. D. Smith, M. Gwinn, S. Ebrahim, L. J Palmer, and M. J Khoury
Make it HuGE: human genome epidemiology reviews, population health, and the IJE
Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2006; 35(3): 507 - 510.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
G. D. Smith
Classics in epidemiology: should they get it right?
Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2004; 33(3): 441 - 442.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Katan, M. B
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Katan, M. B
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?