Skip Navigation


IJE Advance Access originally published online on March 26, 2008
International Journal of Epidemiology 2008 37(3):547-548; doi:10.1093/ije/dyn057
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
37/3/547    most recent
dyn057v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Franco, E L
Right arrow Articles by Spence, A R
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Franco, E L
Right arrow Articles by Spence, A R
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association © The Author 2008; all rights reserved.

Commentary: Smoking and human papillomavirus infection: the pursuit of credibility for an epidemiologic association

E L Franco* and A R Spence

Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics and Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.

*Corresponding author. Department of Epidemiology & Biostalistics and Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada. E-mail: eduardo.franco@mcgill.ca

Accepted 27 February 2008

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

As the most important among the modifiable risk factors for many cancer types tobacco smoking is dutifully treated as a potent confounder when epidemiologists explore new candidate relations. The role for smoking changes from ‘confounder’ to ‘confounded’ variable in anogenital cancers. Among the latter, cervical cancer is a case in point. Smoking was first suspected as a risk factor for cervical cancer in the mid 60s but although most studies have replicated the finding1 the association was always seen with suspicion because of confounding by sexual activity.2 Number of sexual partners and age at first intercourse . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?