IJE Advance Access originally published online on June 8, 2007
International Journal of Epidemiology 2007 36(3):540-541; doi:10.1093/ije/dym110
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association © The Author 2007; all rights reserved.
Commentary: Life-course and social epidemiology, the biological fig leaf and Bob Dylan
Research Director, National Institute of Public Health, Oster Farimagsgade 5A, DK-1399 Copenhagen K, Denmark.
E-mail: ana@niph.dk
| The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below. |
The life-course approach to adult disease is highlighted in epidemiological research these years, and, although life-course thinking covers much more than social epidemiology, social and demographic factors as early life exposures are prominent in this focus.
Prospective studies of life-course influences on adult disease rely on the data available. Luckily, our predecessors set up a few large-scale studies that, in turn, ended up being cohort studies with repeated data collection sweeps, where follow-ups were combined with continuous collection of exposure data.1 The 1958 British cohort is one of these gold mines for life-course research. The latest data collection sweep included a clinical examination of all available participants at age 44–45
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. D. Smith Lifecourse epidemiology of disease: a tractable problem? Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2007; 36(3): 479 - 480. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Ben-Shlomo Rising to the challenges and opportunities of life course epidemiology Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2007; 36(3): 481 - 483. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
