Skip Navigation


IJE Advance Access originally published online on January 24, 2007
International Journal of Epidemiology 2007 36(1):3-10; doi:10.1093/ije/dyl296
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
36/1/3    most recent
dyl296v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kunitz, S. J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kunitz, S. J
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association © The Author 2007; all rights reserved.

Editorial

Sex, race and social role—history and the social determinants of health

Stephen J Kunitz

Department of Community and Preventive Medicine, University of Rochester Medical School, Rochester, NY, USA.

E-mail: Stephen_Kunitz@urmc.rochester.edu

Keywords Sex, race, ethnicity, social class

Accepted 4 December 2006

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Introduction

Just as sex, drugs and rock and roll were fetishized in the 1960s, so do we now do the same with sex, race and social roles and their impact upon the health of individuals and populations. The result is that we often tend to reify these concepts and use them without exploring their content or their meaning in different contexts. The point I would like to make is that these three important attributes of individuals do not bear a constant relationship to health and disease. Their significance is shaped by the context: historical, socio-economic, cultural and epidemiologic among others. This means that there are no laws that are broadly true and that can be the basis of predictions of future associations between sex, race, and social roles on the one hand and health and disease on the other. This is, I think, the most important lesson history has to teach . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Sex

Race7

Social stratification14

Conclusion


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Int J EpidemiolHome page
S. Ebrahim
Cabbages and condoms
Int. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2009; 38(2): 327 - 329.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Int J EpidemiolHome page
O. Naess and A. Schiotz
Commentary: Kristian Feyer Andvord's studies on the epidemiology of tuberculosis and the origin of generation cohort analysis
Int. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2008; 37(5): 923 - 932.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JAMAHome page
G. K. Swamy, T. Ostbye, and R. Skjaerven
Association of Preterm Birth With Long-term Survival, Reproduction, and Next-Generation Preterm Birth
JAMA, March 26, 2008; 299(12): 1429 - 1436.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Int J EpidemiolHome page
S. Ebrahim
Fetishes, social determinants and the adipose tissue overflow hypothesis
Int. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2007; 36(1): 1 - 2.
[Full Text] [PDF]