Skip Navigation


IJE Advance Access originally published online on January 13, 2005
International Journal of Epidemiology 2005 34(1):3-4; doi:10.1093/ije/dyh391
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
34/1/3    most recent
dyh391v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Michels, K. B
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Michels, K. B
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

IJE vol.34 no.1 © International Epidemiological Association 2005; all rights reserved.

Editorial

A maternalistic approach to prevention

Karin B Michels

Obstetrics and Gynecology Epidemiology Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 221 Longwood Avenue, MA 02115, USA and Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA. E-mail: kmichels@rics.bwh.harvard.edu

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

One of the fundamental goals of public health is the prevention of disease to reduce human suffering. Identifying risk factors for diseases is an important milestone towards prevention, but influencing global health often requires converting such findings into behavioural modifications. We are painfully aware how difficult behavioural changes are, and consequently many insights into disease causation remain scientific discoveries that do not translate into substantial reductions of the global burden of disease. Can we more effectively convert our knowledge into successful prevention using a population strategy of prevention that circumvents the individual's choice? Or does our society favour the freedom of the individual's choice even at the expense of a conscious . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?