Skip Navigation


IJE Advance Access originally published online on July 28, 2004
International Journal of Epidemiology 2004 33(4):667-671; doi:10.1093/ije/dyh204
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
33/4/667    most recent
dyh204v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (20)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Putnam, R. D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Putnam, R. D
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

IJE vol.33 no.4 © International Epidemiological Association 2004; all rights reserved.

Commentary

Commentary: ‘Health by association’: some comments

Robert D Putnam

Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, 79 JFK Street, Taubman 370, Cambridge MA 02138, USA. E-mail: robert_putnam@harvard.edu

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

That ‘social capital’ has been, at least, faddish in international policy and social scientific circles during the last decade is beyond doubt. After several decades of intellectual and political hegemony on the part of an individualistic philosophy that claimed that ‘there is no such thing as society,’1 advocates of the social capital perspective argued for renewed emphasis on the importance of social networks and norms in many spheres of our lives—from job placement to democratic governance to health. To be sure, in a number of specific sub-disciplines, such as the sociology of labour markets or criminology or social epidemiology, researchers were already well aware of the importance of social networks.* The new social capital agenda capitalized on this prior work, and by framing the underlying issues in terms of a broader intellectual agenda, gave added prominence to it. Researchers in many different fields (not just those in which social networks . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Health PsycholHome page
S. Abbott and D. Freeth
Social Capital and Health: Starting to Make Sense of the Role of Generalized Trust and Reciprocity
J Health Psychol, October 1, 2008; 13(7): 874 - 883.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Int J EpidemiolHome page
P. Tammes
Survival of Jews during the Holocaust: the importance of different types of social resources
Int. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2007; 36(2): 330 - 335.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Int J EpidemiolHome page
G. DAVEY SMITH
Cultural climate, physical climate, life, and death
Int. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2006; 35(2): 211 - 212.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Int J EpidemiolHome page
B. Harris
Health by association
Int. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2005; 34(2): 488 - 490.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Int J EpidemiolHome page
S. Ebrahim
Social capital: everything or nothing?
Int. J. Epidemiol., August 1, 2004; 33(4): 627 - 627.
[Full Text] [PDF]