Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shaw, G. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shaw, G. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal of Epidemiology 2003;32:910-915
© International Epidemiological Association 2003


Reprints and Reflections

The Doctor’s Dilemma

George Bernard Shaw

The Society of Authors, on behalf of the Bernard Shaw Estate. Reprinted with permission.

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.


    Extracts from Preface on Doctors
 
It is not the fault of our doctors that the medical service of the community, as at present provided for, is a murderous absurdity. That any sane nation, having observed that you could provide for the supply of bread by giving bakers a pecuniary interest in baking for you, should go on to give a surgeon a pecuniary interest in cutting off your leg, is enough to make one despair of political humanity. But that is precisely what we have done. And the more appalling the mutilation, the more the mutilator is paid. He who corrects the ingrowing toe-nail receives a few shillings: he who cuts your inside out receives hundreds of guineas,1 except when he does it to a poor person for practice.

Scandalized voices murmur that these operations are necessary. They may be. It may also be necessary to hang a man or pull down a house. But . . . [Full Text of this Article]


    Why doctors do not differ
 

    Medical poverty
 

    Are doctors men of science?
 

    Statistical illusions
 

    The suprises of attention and neglect
 

    Stealing credit from civilization
 

    Patient-made therapeutics
 

    The reforms also come from the laity
 

    Fashions and epidemics
 

    The social solution of the medical problem
 

    The latest theories
 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
L. Donaldson
Commentary: The Doctor's Dilemma: a response
Int. J. Epidemiol., December 1, 2003; 32(6): 915 - 916.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
K S. Reddy
Commentary: Shaw's critique of health care is still valid
Int. J. Epidemiol., December 1, 2003; 32(6): 919 - 921.
[Full Text] [PDF]