Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goodman, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goodman, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal of Epidemiology 2003;32:699-702
© International Epidemiological Association 2003


Reprints and Reflections

Commentary: The P-value, devalued

Steven Goodman

Department of Oncology, Division of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 550 N. Broadway, Suite 1103, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. E-mail: sgoodman@jhmi.edu

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Of the many honorifics bestowed on the articles in this historical series, it is doubtful that any have had applied the best—funny. The rhetorical zest and smiling outrage that Joseph

Berkson brings to his puncturing of the quasi-religious precepts of traditional statistics in his classic article1 recalls for me a public debate I witnessed in the 1980s between a highly respected statistician and a surgeon clinical-trialist. It was a debate on issues related to the adjustment of P-values in clinical trials, and what I remember best was the entrance of the physician in full surgical regalia; green operating scrubs, face mask, shoe covers, the whole bit. Playing effectively the role of the ‘aw-shucks, I’m just a country doc who don’t know nuthin’ ‘bout statistics’ he parodied traditional statistical precepts so effectively, contrasting them unfavourably with common-sense judgements, that the statistician, however meritorious his rebuttal may have been, . . . [Full Text of this Article]


    Appendix
 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Adv. Physiol. Educ.Home page
D. Curran-Everett
Explorations in statistics: hypothesis tests and P values
Advan Physiol Educ, June 1, 2009; 33(2): 81 - 86.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
J. P. A. Ioannidis
Effect of Formal Statistical Significance on the Credibility of Observational Associations
Am. J. Epidemiol., August 15, 2008; 168(4): 374 - 383.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
G. Davey Smith
Uncertainty and significance
Int. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2003; 32(5): 683 - 683.
[Full Text] [PDF]