Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marmot, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marmot, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal of Epidemiology 2002;31:1122-1124
© International Epidemiological Association 2002


Point-Counterpoint

Commentary: Occupational therapy or the major challenge?

Michael Marmot

International Centre for Health and Society, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, 1–19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 6BT, UK.

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

At a meeting in Kuopio in Finland in the 1980s, at the welcome dinner, our host stood up to welcome the delegates. Being in the centre of the room, at any one time, he had his back turned to about half the room. Despite this, he impressed by somehow talking to both sides at the same time. This was a trick, he explained, that Finns learnt from being sandwiched between two opposing interests: Russia and Sweden. This is a useful skill for those who have been concerned with developing knowledge of risk factors for coronary heart disease (CHD), and applying it to primary prevention. Facing one way, they encounter the mainstream of clinical medicine, suspicious of prevention as an approach and doubtful of its efficacy; and biomedical research concerned with fundamental disease mechanisms. When fighting these battles my sympathies are with the risk factor brigade. On the other side, there . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
C Allonier, A Chevalier, M Zins, O Catelinois, S. Consoli, M Goldberg, and G Lahon
Anxiety or depressive disorders and risk of ischaemic heart disease among French power company employees
Int. J. Epidemiol., August 1, 2004; 33(4): 779 - 786.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
P. Surtees, N. Wainwright, R. Luben, K.-T. Khaw, and N. Day
Sense of Coherence and Mortality in Men and Women in the EPIC-Norfolk United Kingdom Prospective Cohort Study
Am. J. Epidemiol., December 15, 2003; 158(12): 1202 - 1209.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
P. McCarron and D. A. Lawlor
Editorial Comment--North, South: Changing Directions in Cardiovascular Epidemiology
Stroke, November 1, 2003; 34(11): 2609 - 2611.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
A Singh-Manoux, J Macleod, and G Davey Smith
Psychosocial factors and public health
J. Epidemiol. Community Health, August 1, 2003; 57(8): 553 - 556.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
C C Tam and B A Lopman
Determinism versus stochasticism: in support of long coffee breaks
J. Epidemiol. Community Health, July 1, 2003; 57(7): 477 - 478.
[Full Text] [PDF]