Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gee, E. M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gee, E. M
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal of Epidemiology 2002;31:750-753
© International Epidemiological Association 2002


Symposium Theme: Ageing

Misconceptions and misapprehensions about population ageing

Ellen M Gee

Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6 Canada. E-mail: gee@sfu.ca

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

The last decade has seen the emergence of neo-liberal policies and agendas, and a parallel dismantling of the public provision of health and social services and programmes in most western countries. This neo-liberalism represents an endorsement of, or at the very least an accommodation to, the primacy of the individual and his/her efforts to ensure his/her own well-being, and a corresponding de-emphasis of conceptualizations of, and commitments to, shared risk, rights of citizenship, and the common good. Population ageing has played a fundamental role in this transition; the public costs of population ageing—particularly regarding health care and pensions—are purported to be unsustainable without considerable welfare state ‘reform’. Reform is of course a process, and it has taken differing shapes in various western countries. I focus on North America, and particularly Canada, examining the links between reform and (mis)perceptions about population ageing, concentrating on the latter.

In the last few years, . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Dimensions of ‘population ageing as crisis’ thinking

The (un)certainty of demographic projections

Reliance on dependency ratios

Homogenization of the elderly population

‘Common sense’: ageing and public health care costs

Summary


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Public Finance ReviewHome page
J. Ruggeri and Y. Zou
Measures of Fiscal Dependency
Public Finance Review, July 1, 2006; 34(4): 381 - 403.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Scand J Public HealthHome page
M. Hyde, J. Hagberg, G. Oxenstierna, T. Theorell, and H. Westerlund
Bridges, pathways and valleys: labour market position and risk of hospitalization in a Swedish sample aged 55 - 63
Scand J Public Health, October 1, 2004; 32(5): 368 - 373.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci.Home page
M.-M. G. Wilson
Robine and Michel's "Looking Forward to a General Theory on Population Aging": Commentary: Clash of the Titans: Death, Old Age, and the Devil's Advocate
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., June 1, 2004; 59(6): M612 - M615.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
S. Ebrahim
Ageing, health and society
Int. J. Epidemiol., August 1, 2002; 31(4): 715 - 718.
[Full Text] [PDF]