International Journal of Epidemiology 2001;30:1253-1258
© International Epidemiological Association 2001
Reprints and Reflections |
Commentary: Treatment of bladder stones and probabilistic reasoning in medicine: an 1835 account and its lessons for the present
Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands. E-mail: j.p.vandenbroucke@lumc.nl
The 1835 paper by Dr Civiale (17921867) that was translated by Angela Swaine Verdier is an historical gem.1 Many possible comments are possible about this paper. In the following, I have commented upon the text as suchwithout the benefit of any comparative study of similar papers, or reactions to this paper in the contemporary literature of the time, except for general historical and medical references that I had immediately at hand.
In brief, the paper is a narrative commenting upon the work of Dr Civiale that was presented to the Académie de Médecine. The comments were made by four people who were members of the Académie and they present the work of their colleague in the form of a review. The first part of this review describes the numerical data presented by the author, with some remarks on its strengths and weaknesses. The essence of that first part is a
Urinary Bladder Stones and their Treatment
The Presentation of the Work
Lithotomy versus Lithotripty
Probabilistic Reasoning in Medicine
Conclusions
References