Skip Navigation



IJE Advance Access published online on September 23, 2009

International Journal of Epidemiology, doi:10.1093/ije/dyp287
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cook, M. B
Right arrow Articles by McGlynn, K. A
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cook, M. B
Right arrow Articles by McGlynn, K. A
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association 2009.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of perinatal variables in relation to the risk of testicular cancer—experiences of the mother

Michael B Cook1,*, Olof Akre2, David Forman3, M Patricia Madigan1, Lorenzo Richiardi4 and Katherine A McGlynn1

1 Hormonal and Reproductive Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
2 Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska Sjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.
3 Cancer Epidemiology Group, Leeds Institute of Genetics, Health and Therapeutics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
4 Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Department of Human Oncology and Biomedical Sciences, University of Turin, Torino, Italy.

* Corresponding author. Hormonal and Reproductive Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, DHHS, 6120 Executive Blvd, EPS/Suite 550/Room 5012, Bethesda, MD 20852-7234, USA. E-mail: michael.cook{at}nih.gov


   Abstract

Background We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of perinatal variables in relation to testicular cancer risk, with a specific focus upon characteristics of the mother.

Methods EMBASE, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases were searched using sensitive search strategies. Meta-analysis was undertaken using STATA 10.

Results A total of 5865 references were retrieved, of which 67 met the inclusion criteria and contributed data to at least one perinatal analysis. Random effects meta-analysis found maternal bleeding during pregnancy [odds ratio (OR) 1.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02–1.73], birth order (primiparous vs not, 1.08, 95% CI 1.01–1.16; second vs first, OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.88–0.99; third vs first, OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.83–1.01; fourth vs first, OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.69–0.94) and sibship size (2 vs 1, OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.75–1.15; 3 vs 1, OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.74–1.07; 4 vs 1, OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.62–0.90) to be associated with testicular cancer risk. Meta-analyses that produced summary estimates which indicated no association included maternal age, maternal nausea, maternal hypertension, pre-eclampsia, breech delivery and caesarean section. Meta-regression provided evidence that continent of study is important in the relationship between caesarean section and testicular cancer (P = 0.035), and a meta-analysis restricted to the three studies from the USA was suggestive of association (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.07–2.56).

Conclusions This systematic review and meta-analysis has found evidence for associations of maternal bleeding, birth order, sibship size and possibly caesarean section with risk of testicular cancer.

Keywords Epidemiology, meta-analysis, pregnancy, review, systematic, testicular neoplasms

Accepted 28 July 2009


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.