Skip Navigation


IJE Advance Access originally published online on June 15, 2009
International Journal of Epidemiology 2009 38(5):1310-1322; doi:10.1093/ije/dyp226
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
38/5/1310    most recent
dyp226v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Int. J. Epidemiol.
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fujiwara, T.
Right arrow Articles by Kawachi, I.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fujiwara, T.
Right arrow Articles by Kawachi, I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association © The Author 2009; all rights reserved.

Is education causally related to better health? A twin fixed-effect study in the USA

Takeo Fujiwara1,* and Ichiro Kawachi2

1 Section of Behavioral Science, Department of Health Promotion, National Institute of Public Health, Saitama, Japan.
2 Department of Society, Human Development and Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

* Corresponding author. Section of Behavioral Science, Department of Health Promotion, National Institute of Public Health, 2-3-6 Minami, Wako-shi, Saitama 351-0197, Japan. E-mail: tfujiwara{at}niph.go.jp


   Abstract

Background More years of schooling is generally associated with better health. However, this association may be confounded by unobserved common prior causes such as inherited ability, personality such as patience, or early family circumstances. The twin fixed-effect approach can potentially address this problem by cancelling these factors between twin pairs. The purpose of this study is to identify the causal effects of education on health and health behaviours using a twin fixed-effect approach.

Methods We used twin data from the National Survey of Midlife Development in the United States, 1995–1996. The study population included 302 male [55.6% monozygotic (MZ) and 44.4% dizygotic (DZ)] and 387 female twin pairs (47.3% MZ and 52.7% DZ). A range of health outcomes [perceived global, physical and mental health, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, waist–hip ratio, number of depressive symptoms] and health behaviours (smoking and physical activity) were examined among twin pairs who were discordant on years of schooling.

Results Among MZ twins, more years of education was associated with better perceived global health. For all other health outcomes/behaviours, the point estimates of the effect of education in the fixed-effect analyses suggested a weak protective association. Among DZ male twins, each additional year of schooling lowered the prevalence of smoking by 32% [odds ratio (OR): 0.68, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.48–0.97] in the fixed-effect analysis.

Conclusion The widely reported associations between schooling and health outcomes/behaviours may not reflect causal relationships in every instance. Although low statistical power may explain some of the null associations, our twin fixed-effect analyses suggest that at least some cases of the education/health relationship reflect confounding by unobserved third variables.


Keywords Education, schooling, health status, health behaviours, twin study

Accepted 13 May 2009


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in Int. J. Epidemiol.:

Commentary: Strengths and limitations of the discordant twin-pair design in social epidemiology. Where do we go from here?
Mia Madsen and Merete Osler
Int. J. Epidemiol. 2009 38: 1322-1323. [Extract] [Full Text]  

Commentary: Strengths and limitations of the discordant twin-pair design in social epidemiology. Where do we go from here?
Mia Madsen and Merete Osler
Int. J. Epidemiol. 2009 10.1093/ije/dyp264. [Extract] [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
M. Madsen and M. Osler
Commentary: Strengths and limitations of the discordant twin-pair design in social epidemiology. Where do we go from here?
Int. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2009; 38(5): 1322 - 1323.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.