Skip Navigation



IJE Advance Access published online on May 15, 2009

International Journal of Epidemiology, doi:10.1093/ije/dyp210
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
38/4/1118    most recent
dyp210v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Turner, C. F
Right arrow Articles by Cooley, P. C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Turner, C. F
Right arrow Articles by Cooley, P. C
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association © The Author 2009; all rights reserved.

Improving epidemiological surveys of sexual behaviour conducted by telephone

Charles F Turner1,2,*, Alia Al-Tayyib2,3, Susan M Rogers2, Elizabeth Eggleston2, Maria A Villarroel2,4, Anthony M Roman5, James R Chromy6 and Phillip C Cooley7

1Queens College and the Graduate Center, City University of New York, Flushing, NY, USA.
2Program in Health and Behavior Measurement, Research Triangle Institute, Washington, DC, USA.
3Denver Public Health, Denver, CO, USA.
4Department of Epidemiology, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
5Center for Survey Research, University of Massachusetts at Boston, Boston, MA, USA.
6Statistics and Epidemiology Division, Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
7Research Computing Division, Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.

* Corresponding author. Queens College, City University of New York, Flushing, NY 11367, USA. E-mail: cfturner{at}popepi.org


   Abstract

Background This study assesses the impact of Telephone Audio Computer-Assisted Self-Interviewing (T-ACASI) on the reporting of sensitive (mainly heterosexual) behaviours.

Methods A randomized experiment was embedded in a telephone survey that drew probability samples of the populations of the USA (N = 1543) and Baltimore city (N = 744). Respondents were randomly assigned to have questions asked either by a T-ACASI computer or by a human telephone interviewer.

Results Compared with interviewer-administered telephone surveys, T-ACASI obtained more frequent reporting of a range of mainly heterosexual behaviours that were presumed to be sensitive, including recency of anal sex [adjusted odds ratio (A-OR) = 2.00, P < 0.001), sex during menstrual period (A-OR = 1.49, P < 0.001), giving oral sex (A-OR = 1.40, P = 0.001) and receiving oral sex (A-OR = 1.36, P = 0.002), and sexual difficulties for the respondent (A-OR = 1.45, P = 0.034) and their main sex partner (A-OR = 1.48, P = 0.0). T-ACASI also obtained less frequent reporting that respondent had a ‘main sex partner’ (A-OR = 0.56, P = 0.011) and discussed contraception prior to first sex with that sex partner (A-OR = 0.82, P = 0.094). For both males and females, T-ACASI obtained more frequent reports of first vaginal sex occurring at early ages (before ages 12 through 15). ‘For males only’, T-ACASI also elicited more frequent reports that first vaginal sex had ‘not’ occurred at later ages (i.e. by ages 20 through 24).

Conclusion T-ACASI increases the likelihood that survey respondents will report sensitive heterosexual behaviours.

Keywords Population surveys, methodology, sexual behaviours, STD risk behaviours, T-ACASI, computerized surveys, sexually transmitted infections

Accepted 9 April 2009


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.