Skip Navigation



IJE Advance Access published online on April 17, 2009
International Journal of Epidemiology, doi:10.1093/ije/dyp174
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
39/1/89    most recent
dyp174v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dekkers, O M
Right arrow Articles by Vandenbroucke, J P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dekkers, O M
Right arrow Articles by Vandenbroucke, J P
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association © The Author 2009; all rights reserved.

How to assess the external validity of therapeutic trials: a conceptual approach

O M Dekkers1,2,*, E von Elm3,4, A Algra1,5,6, J A Romijn2 and J P Vandenbroucke1

1Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
2Department of Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
3Institute of Social & Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
4Department of Medical Biometry and Medical Informatics, University Medical Centre, Freiburg, Germany.
5Julius Center for Health Sciences and Patient Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
6Rudolf Magnus Institute, Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

* Corresponding author. Department of Clinical Epidemiology C7-99, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands. E-mail: o.m.dekkers{at}lumc.nl


  Abstract

Background External validity of study results is an important issue from a clinical point of view. From a methodological point of view, however, the concept of external validity is more complex than it seems to be at first glance.

Methods Methodological review to address the concept of external validity.

Results External validity refers to the question whether results are generalizable to persons other than the population in the original study. The only formal way to establish the external validity would be to repeat the study for that specific target population. We propose a three-way approach for assessing the external validity for specified target populations. (i) The study population might not be representative for the eligibility criteria that were intended. It should be addressed whether the study population differs from the intended source population with respect to characteristics that influence outcome. (ii) The target population will, by definition, differ from the study population with respect to geographical, temporal and ethnical conditions. Pondering external validity means asking the question whether these differences may influence study results. (iii) It should be assessed whether the study's conclusions can be generalized to target populations that do not meet all the eligibility criteria.

Conclusion Judging the external validity of study results cannot be done by applying given eligibility criteria to a single target population. Rather, it is a complex reflection in which prior knowledge, statistical considerations, biological plausibility and eligibility criteria all have place.

Keywords Clinical trial, external validity

Accepted 3 March 2009


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Int J EpidemiolHome page
P. M Rothwell
Commentary: External validity of results of randomized trials: disentangling a complex concept
Int. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2010; 39(1): 94 - 96.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.