Skip Navigation



IJE Advance Access published online on March 30, 2009

International Journal of Epidemiology, doi:10.1093/ije/dyp156
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
38/6/1711    most recent
dyp156v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tobias, M.
Right arrow Articles by Atkinson, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tobias, M.
Right arrow Articles by Atkinson, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association © The Author 2009; all rights reserved.

Changing trends in indigenous inequalities in mortality: lessons from New Zealand

Martin Tobias1,*, Tony Blakely2, Don Matheson3, Kumanan Rasanathan4 and June Atkinson5

1 Public Health Physician, Health and Disability Intelligence, Ministry of Health, Wellington, New Zealand.
2 Director of Health Inequalities Research Programme, University of Otago, Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
3 Public Health Physician, University of Otago, Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
4 Department of Ethics, Equity, Trade and Human Rights, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
5 Health Inequalities Research Programme, University of Otago, Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.

* Corresponding author. Public Health Physician, Health and Disability Intelligence, Ministry of Health, PO Box 5013, Wellington, New Zealand. E-mail: martin_tobias{at}moh.govt.nz


   Abstract

Background We describe trends from 1951 to 2006 in inequalities in mortality between the indigenous (Maori) and non-indigenous (non-Maori, mainly European-descended) populations of New Zealand. We relate these trends to the historical context in which they occurred, including major structural adjustment of the economy from the mid 1980s to the mid 1990s, followed by a retreat from neoliberal social and economic policies from the late 1990s onwards. This was accompanied by economic recovery and the introduction of health reforms, including a reorientation of the health system towards primary health care.

Methods Abridged period lifetables for Maori and non-Maori from 1951 to 2006 were constructed using standard demographic methods. Absolute [standardized rate difference (SRD)] and relative [standardized rate ratio (SRR)] mortality inequalities for Maori compared with European/Other ethnic groups (aged 1–74 years) were measured using the New Zealand Census-Mortality Study (an ongoing data linkage study that links mortality to census records) from 1981–84 to 2001–04. The SRDs were decomposed into their contributions from major causes of death. Poisson regression modelling was used to estimate the extent of socio-economic mediation of the ethnic mortality inequality over time.

Results Life expectancy gaps and relative inequalities in mortality rates (aged 1–74 years) widened and then narrowed again, in tandem with the trends in social inequalities (allowing for a short lag). Among females, the contribution of cardiovascular disease to absolute mortality inequalities steadily decreased, but was partly offset by an increasing contribution from cancer. Among males, the contribution of CVD increased from the early 1980s to the 1990s, then decreased again. The extent of socio-economic mediation of the ethnic mortality inequality peaked in 1991–94, again more notably among males.

Conclusion Our results are consistent with a causal association between changing economic inequalities and changing health inequalities between ethnic groups. However, causality cannot be established from a historical analysis alone. Three lessons nevertheless emerge from the New Zealand experience: the lag between changes in ethnic social inequality and ethnic health inequality may be short (<5 years); both changes in the distribution of the social determinants of health and an appropriate health system response may be required to address ethnic health inequalities; and timely monitoring of ethnic health inequalities, based on high-quality ethnicity data, may help to sustain political commitment to pro-equity health and social policies.

Keywords Indigenous health, inequality, New Zealand

Accepted 11 February 2009


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.