IJE Advance Access first published online on December 17, 2008
This version published online on January 9, 2009
International Journal of Epidemiology, doi:10.1093/ije/dyn268
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The triumph of the null hypothesis: epidemiology in an age of change
University of Memphis, School of Public Health, Memphis, TN 38152, USA.
Corresponding author. University of Memphis, 633 Normal Street, Memphis, TN 38152, USA. E-mail: wmaziak{at}memphis.edu
 |
Abstract |
|---|
Summary The recent confusion concerning the relation between hormone replacement therapy and cardiovascular disease has stirred a new wave of debate about the value and future of epidemiology. Opponents of epidemiology suggest an ever-diminishing role in an age of small risks and complex diseases, yet proponents are not in consensus about how to adapt their discipline to the challenges associated with ageing societies and changing disease patterns. While epidemiology is likely to be increasingly called upon to make sense of the risks involved with these changes, wading into this era with a mindset and tools that were derived from epidemiology's ‘golden era’ of tackling major risk factors, has created more confusion than understanding. Increasingly, we need to downsize epidemiology to what is testable, measurable, and relevant, based on robust methodology and public health rationale. Applying an evolutionary perspective, that views health problems of modernity as a manifestation of the mismatch between our ancient genes and hi-tech lifestyles, can provide guidance for a 21st century research agenda.
Keywords Epidemiology, chronic disease, small risk, complex disease, evolutionary epidemiology
Accepted 8 May 2008
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
Related articles in Int. J. Epidemiol.:
- Response: Time for species—course epidemiology?
- Neil Pearce and Jeroen Douwes
Int. J. Epidemiol. 2009 38: 403-410.[Extract] [Full Text] - Commentary: Maziak's essay, seen from another angle
- Jan P Vandenbroucke
Int. J. Epidemiol. 2009 38: 410-412.[Extract] [Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  N. Pearce and J. Douwes Response: Time for species--course epidemiology? Int. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2009; 38(2): 403 - 410. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. D Dunn Author's Response: The triumph of the null hypothesis: epidemiology in an age of change Int. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2009; 38(2): 607 - 607. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. Maziak Author's Response: Epidemiology between astronomy and astrology Int. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2009; 38(2): 608 - 610. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Pearce and J. Douwes Author's Response: Epidemiology between astronomy and astrology Int. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2009; 38(2): 610 - 611. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|