Skip Navigation



IJE Advance Access published online on June 24, 2008

International Journal of Epidemiology, doi:10.1093/ije/dyn112
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
37/5/1109    most recent
dyn112v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morgen, C. S.
Right arrow Articles by Andersen, A.-M. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Morgen, C. S.
Right arrow Articles by Andersen, A.-M. N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association © The Author 2008; all rights reserved.

Socioeconomic position and the risk of preterm birth—a study within the Danish National Birth Cohort

Camilla Schmidt Morgen1,*, Christina Bjørk1, Per Kragh Andersen2, Laust Hvas Mortensen1 and Anne-Marie Nybo Andersen1,3

1 National Institute of Public Health, Copenhagen, Denmark.
2 Department of Biostatistics, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
3 Epidemiology, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark.

* Corresponding author. National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Oester Farimagsgade 5, DK-1399 Copenhagen K, Denmark. E-mail: csm{at}niph.dk


   Abstract

Background Low socioeconomic position is generally associated with increased risk of preterm birth, but it remains unclear whether the inequality depends on the socioeconomic measure used, if the associations differ according to the degree of prematurity, and how individual level risk factors mediate the association.

Methods The hazard ratios (HR) of preterm birth associated with five different measures of socioeconomic position and three degrees of preterm birth were analysed in a dataset of 75 890 singleton pregnancies (1996–2002) from the Danish National Birth Cohort. This, and the mediating role of selected individual level risk factors (smoking, alcohol consumption, binge drinking, pre-pregnancy body mass index, gestational weight gain) were estimated, using Cox regression analyses.

Results Mothers with <10 years of education had an elevated risk of preterm birth compared with mothers with >12 years of education and the association interacted with parity, while income and occupation affected the risk to a lesser degree. The adjusted HR for less educated nulliparous and parous women were 1.22 (95% CI 1.04–1.42) and 1.56 (95% CI 1.31–1.87), respectively, compared with women with >12 years of education. For parous women with <10 years of education inclusion of smoking in the model decreased the HR of preterm birth to 1.43 (95% CI 1.19–1.72).

Conclusions Maternal educational level was the strongest predictor of preterm birth among five socioeconomic measures and the gradient did not differ significantly according to the degree of preterm birth. For parous women smoking explained some of the educational gradient but in general the selected risk factors only reduced the relative educational gradient in preterm birth marginally.

Keywords Premature labour, gestational age, socioeconomic position, pregnancy, obstetrics

Accepted 24 April 2008


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A.S. Khashan, R. McNamee, K.M. Abel, P.B. Mortensen, L.C. Kenny, M.G. Pedersen, R.T. Webb, and P.N. Baker
Rates of preterm birth following antenatal maternal exposure to severe life events: a population-based cohort study
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2009; 24(2): 429 - 437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.