Skip Navigation



IJE Advance Access published online on November 23, 2004

International Journal of Epidemiology, doi:10.1093/ije/dyh346
© 2004 by International Epidemiological Association
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
34/1/113    most recent
dyh346v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Int. J. Epidemiol.
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marshall, S. W.
Right arrow Articles by Feehan, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marshall, S. W.
Right arrow Articles by Feehan, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Accepted September 2, 2004

Original paper

Evaluation of protective equipment for prevention of injuries in rugby union

Stephen W. Marshall 1*, Dana P. Loomis 2, Anna E. Waller 3, David J. Chalmers 4, Yvonne N. Bird 4, Kenneth L. Quarrie 4, and Michael Feehan 5

1 Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Orthopedics, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
2 Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
3 Department of Orthopedics, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
4 Injury Prevention Research Unit, Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
5 Observant LLV, Wellesley, MA, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Stephen W. Marshall, E-mail: SMarshall{at}unc.edu


   Abstract

Background Rugby union has a high rate of injury. The increased use of protective equipment may help mitigate these injuries. This study investigated the injury prevention effectiveness of the protective equipment used in rugby union.

Methods A cohort of 304 rugby players in Dunedin, New Zealand was followed weekly during the 1993 club season to assess protective equipment use, participation in rugby, and injury outcomes. Generalized Poisson regression was used to model the rate of injury while adjusting for covariates such as level of competition, playing position, and injury history.

Results The use of mouthguards appeared to lower the risk of orofacial injury [rate ratio (RR) = 0.56, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.07-4.63], and padded headgear tended to prevent damage to the scalp and ears (RR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.19-1.86). Support sleeves tended to reduce the risk of sprains and strains (RR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.26-1.27). The risk of concussion was not lessened by the use of padded headgear (RR = 1.13, 95% CI: 0.40-3.16) or mouthguards (RR = 1.62, 95% CI: 0.51-5.11). There was no evidence of protective effects for any other equipment item (taping, shinguards, and grease).

Conclusions The protective equipment used in rugby union has limited effectiveness in preventing injuries. The results are supportive, however, of a role for mouthguards and padded headgear in preventing orofacial and scalp injuries, respectively, and for support sleeves in preventing sprains and strains.

Keywords: Protective devices; mouth protectors; contact sports; athletic injuries; brain concussion.
A Commentary has been commissioned to accompany this paper and will appear in the print issue with this article.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in Int. J. Epidemiol.:

Commentary: Mad New Zealanders, tape, and grease: assessing protective equipment for rugby union players
Barry Pless
Int. J. Epidemiol. 2005 10.1093/ije/dyh379. [Abstract]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Sports. Med.Home page
B W Benson, G M Hamilton, W H Meeuwisse, P McCrory, and J Dvorak
Is protective equipment useful in preventing concussion? A systematic review of the literature
Br. J. Sports Med., May 1, 2009; 43(Suppl_1): i56 - i67.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Sports. Med.Home page
D Van Tiggelen, S Wickes, V Stevens, P Roosen, and E Witvrouw
Effective prevention of sports injuries: a model integrating efficacy, efficiency, compliance and risk-taking behaviour
Br. J. Sports Med., August 1, 2008; 42(8): 648 - 652.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
A. E. Lincoln, R. Y. Hinton, J. L. Almquist, S. L. Lager, and R. W. Dick
Head, Face, and Eye Injuries in Scholastic and Collegiate Lacrosse: A 4-Year Prospective Study
Am. J. Sports Med., February 1, 2007; 35(2): 207 - 215.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Sports. Med.Home page
Evidence based journal watch
Br. J. Sports Med., September 1, 2005; 39(9): 689 - 690.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
B. Pless
Commentary: Mad New Zealanders, tape, and grease: assessing protective equipment for rugby union players
Int. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2005; 34(1): 119 - 120.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.