IJE Advance Access published online on August 27, 2004
International Journal of Epidemiology, doi:10.1093/ije/dyh138
© 2004 by International Epidemiological Association
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Strangeways Research Laboratory, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: nick.day{at}srl.cam.ac.uk.
Background In nutritional epidemiology, it is common to fit models in which several dietary variables are included. However, with standard instruments for dietary assessment, not only are the intakes of many nutrients often highly correlated, but the errors in the estimation of the intake of different nutrients are also correlated. The effect of this error correlation on the results of observational studies has been little investigated. This paper describes the effect on multivariate regression coefficients of different levels of correlation, both between the variables themselves and between the errors of estimation of these variables. Methods Using a simple model for the multivariate error structure, we examine the effect on the estimates of bivariate linear regression coefficients of (1) differential precision of measurement of the two independent variables, (2) differing levels of correlation between the true values of the two variables, and (3) differing levels of correlation between the errors of measurement of the two variables. As an example, the prediction of plasma vitamin C levels by dietary intake variables is considered, using data from the European Prospective Investigation of Cancer (EPIC) Norfolk study in which dietary intake was estimated using both a food frequency questionaire (FFQ) and a 7-day diary (7DD). The dietary variables considered are vitamin C, fat, and energy, with different approaches taken to energy adjustment. Results When the error correlation is zero, the estimates of the bivariate regression coefficients reflect the precision of measurement of the two variables and mutual confounding. The sum of the observed regression coefficients is biased towards the null as in univariate regression. When the error correlation is non-zero but below about 0.7, the effect is minor. However, as the error correlation increases beyond 0.8 the effect becomes large and highly dependent on the relative precision with which the two variables are measured. At the extreme, the bivariate estimates can become indefinitely large. In the example, the error correlation between fat and energy using the FFQ appears to be over 0.9, the corresponding value for the 7DD being approximately 0.85. The error correlation between vitamin C and fat, and vitamin C and energy, appears to be below 0.5 and smaller for the 7DD than for the FFQ. The impact of these error correlations on bivariate regression coefficients is large. The effect of energy adjustment differs widely between vitamin C and fat. Conclusion High levels of error correlation can have a large effect on bivariate regression estimates, varying widely depending on which two variables are considered. In particular, the effect of energy adjustment will vary widely. For vitamin C, the effect of energy adjustment appears negligible, whereas for fat the effect is large indicating that error correlation close to one can partially remove regression dilution due to measurement error. If, for fat intake, energy adjustment is performed by using energy density, the partial removal of regression dilution is achieved at the expense of substantial reduction in the true variance.
Original paper
Correlated measurement error--implications for nutritional epidemiology
2 Department of Mathematics, The Hong Kong University of Science & Technology, Hong Kong
3 MRC Dunn Human Nutrition Unit, Cambridge, UK
4 Clinical Gerontology Unit, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
5 Ob/Gyn Epidemiology Center, Harvard Medical School, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
6 MRC Epidemiology Unit, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK
Abstract 
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
Related articles in Int. J. Epidemiol.:
- Adjusting for energy intake--what measure to use in nutritional epidemiological studies?
- Rupert W. Jakes, Nicholas E. Day, Robert Luben, Ailsa Welch, Sheila Bingham, Jo Mitchell, Susie Hennings, Kirsten Rennie, and Nicholas J. Wareham
Int. J. Epidemiol. 2004 10.1093/ije/dyh181.[Abstract] - Commentary: Correlated errors and energy adjustment--where are the data?
- Donna Spiegelman
Int. J. Epidemiol. 2004 10.1093/ije/dyh315.[Abstract]
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  F. J. van Duijnhoven, H B. Bueno-De-Mesquita, P. Ferrari, M. Jenab, H. C Boshuizen, M. M Ros, C. Casagrande, A. Tjonneland, A. Olsen, K. Overvad, et al. Fruit, vegetables, and colorectal cancer risk: the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 2009; 89(5): 1441 - 1452. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. E. O'Neil and T. A. Nicklas A Review of the Relationship Between 100% Fruit Juice Consumption and Weight in Children and Adolescents American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, July 1, 2008; 2(4): 315 - 354. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. L. Neuhouser, L. Tinker, P. A. Shaw, D. Schoeller, S. A. Bingham, L. V. Horn, S. A. A. Beresford, B. Caan, C. Thomson, S. Satterfield, et al. Use of Recovery Biomarkers to Calibrate Nutrient Consumption Self-Reports in the Women's Health Initiative Am. J. Epidemiol., May 15, 2008; 167(10): 1247 - 1259. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. J Brunner, A. Mosdol, D. R Witte, P. Martikainen, M. Stafford, M. J Shipley, and M. G Marmot Dietary patterns and 15-y risks of major coronary events, diabetes, and mortality Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 2008; 87(5): 1414 - 1421. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. Ferrari, N. E Day, H. C Boshuizen, A. Roddam, K. Hoffmann, A. Thiebaut, G. Pera, K. Overvad, E. Lund, A. Trichopoulou, et al. The evaluation of the diet/disease relation in the EPIC study: considerations for the calibration and the disease models Int. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2008; 37(2): 368 - 378. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Agudo, L. Cabrera, P. Amiano, E. Ardanaz, A. Barricarte, T. Berenguer, M. D Chirlaque, M. Dorronsoro, P. Jakszyn, N. Larranaga, et al. Fruit and vegetable intakes, dietary antioxidant nutrients, and total mortality in Spanish adults: findings from the Spanish cohort of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC-Spain) Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, June 1, 2007; 85(6): 1634 - 1642. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Nagel, J. Linseisen, H. C Boshuizen, G. Pera, G. Del Giudice, G. P Westert, H B. Bueno-de-Mesquita, N. E Allen, T. J Key, M. E Numans, et al. Socioeconomic position and the risk of gastric and oesophageal cancer in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC-EURGAST) Int. J. Epidemiol., March 12, 2007; (2007) dyl275v2. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. W.J. Beulens, E. B. Rimm, A. Ascherio, D. Spiegelman, H. F.J. Hendriks, and K. J. Mukamal Alcohol Consumption and Risk for Coronary Heart Disease among Men with Hypertension Ann Intern Med, January 2, 2007; 146(1): 10 - 19. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. S Freedman, N. Potischman, V. Kipnis, D. Midthune, A. Schatzkin, F. E Thompson, R. P Troiano, R. Prentice, R. Patterson, R. Carroll, et al. A comparison of two dietary instruments for evaluating the fat-breast cancer relationship Int. J. Epidemiol., August 1, 2006; 35(4): 1011 - 1021. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Spiegelman Commentary: Correlated errors and energy adjustment--where are the data? Int. J. Epidemiol., December 1, 2004; 33(6): 1387 - 1388. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|