Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Woodall, H J T
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Woodall, H J T
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1977 Oxford University Press

other

A Controlled Trial of Multiphasic Screening in Middle-age: Results of the South-East London Screening Study

THE SOUTH-EAST LONDON SCREENING STUDY GROUP, W W Holland*, A L Creese*, M F D'Souza*,, J R J Partridge*, D Shannon*, D H Stone*, A V Swan*, H T Trevelyan*, E Tuckman{dagger} and H J T Woodall{dagger}

* The Department of Community Medicine, St. Thomas's Hospital and Medical School London SE1 7EH England
{dagger} The General Practice, St. Pauls Cray Orpington, Kent

Repring requests should be addressed to Dr. M F D'Souza

The results of a controlled trial of murtiphasic screening in general practice are presented. In 1967, 7,229 individuals aged between 40 and 64 years were randomly allocated into either a Screening or Control group. The Screening group were invited to attend two screening sessions held about two years apart while the Control group continued to receive conventional medical care. Both groups were then invited to undergo a health survey in 1972–73 which revealed no significant differences in morbidity between the two groups. Careful follow-up permitted detailed Screening-Control comparisons of various outcome measures-consultation and hospital admission rates, certified sickness absence from work, and mortality. Nine years after the initial screening, no significant differences were found between the two groups in any of the outcome measures. It is estimated that a similar screening programme for the entire middle-aged UK population would cost £142 million at 1976 prices.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Public Health (Oxf)Home page
S. McCluskey, D. Baker, D. Percy, P. Lewis, and E. Middleton
Reductions in cardiovascular risk in association with population screening: a 10-year longitudinal study
J. Public Health Med., December 1, 2007; 29(4): 379 - 387.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
L. E. Boulware, S. Marinopoulos, K. A. Phillips, C. W. Hwang, K. Maynor, D. Merenstein, R. F. Wilson, G. J. Barnes, E. B. Bass, N. R. Powe, et al.
Systematic Review: The Value of the Periodic Health Evaluation
Ann Intern Med, February 20, 2007; 146(4): 289 - 300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Scand J Public HealthHome page
J. L. Thomsen, B. Karlsmose, E. T. Parner, A. M. Thulstrup, T. Lauritzen, and M. Engberg
Secondary healthcare contacts after multiphasic preventive health screening: A randomized trial
Scand J Public Health, May 1, 2006; 34(3): 254 - 261.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
P. G. O'Malley and P. Greenland
The Annual Physical: Are Physicians and Patients Telling Us Something?
Arch Intern Med, June 27, 2005; 165(12): 1333 - 1334.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
A. V. Prochazka, K. Lundahl, W. Pearson, S. K. Oboler, and R. J. Anderson
Support of Evidence-Based Guidelines for the Annual Physical Examination: A Survey of Primary Care Providers
Arch Intern Med, June 27, 2005; 165(12): 1347 - 1352.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
J. Thomsen, E. Parner, B Karlsmose, A. Thulstrup, T Lauritzen, and M Engberg
Effect of preventive health screening on long-term primary health care utilization. A randomized controlled trial
Fam. Pract., June 1, 2005; 22(3): 242 - 248.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
W. Holland
Commentary: A history of the South-East London Screening Study
Int. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2001; 30(5): 940 - 942.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
G. Fowler
Commentary: GP check-ups' still of limited value
Int. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2001; 30(5): 942 - 943.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
S. Leeder
Commentary: Learning in Lambeth-- the South-East London Screening Study revisited
Int. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2001; 30(5): 944 - 945.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
J. Stamler
Commentary: On the report of the South-East London Screening Study
Int. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2001; 30(5): 946 - 947.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
P. R. Gordon, J. Senf, and D. Campos-Outcalt
Is the Annual Complete Physical Examination Necessary?
Arch Intern Med, May 10, 1999; 159(9): 909 - 910.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
L. Smeeth and S. Iliffe
Effectiveness of screening older people for impaired vision in community setting: systematic review of evidence from randomised controlled trials
BMJ, February 28, 1998; 316(7132): 660 - 663.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
BMJHome page
P Hanlon, J McEwen, L Carey, H Gilmour, C Tannahill, A Tannahill, and M Kelly
Health checks and coronary risk: further evidence from a randomised controlled trial
BMJ, December 16, 1995; 311(7020): 1609 - 1613.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
BMJHome page
J Muir, D Mant, L Jones, and P Yudkin
Effectiveness of health checks conducted by nurses in primary care: results of the OXCHECK study after one year
BMJ, January 29, 1994; 308(6924): 308 - 312.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
BMJHome page
D A Wood, A L Kinmonth, G A Davies, J Yarwood, S G Thompson, S D M Pyke, Y Kok, R Cramb, C Le Guen, T M Marteau, et al.
Randomised controlled trial evaluating cardiovascular screening and intervention in general practice: principal results of British family heart study
BMJ, January 29, 1994; 308(6924): 313 - 320.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.