Skip Navigation


IJE Advance Access originally published online on November 11, 2008
International Journal of Epidemiology 2009 38(1):206-214; doi:10.1093/ije/dyn216
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
38/1/206    most recent
dyn216v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mercer, C. H
Right arrow Articles by Cassell, J. A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mercer, C. H
Right arrow Articles by Cassell, J. A
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association © The Author 2008; all rights reserved.

Who has sex with whom? Characteristics of heterosexual partnerships reported in a national probability survey and implications for STI risk

Catherine H Mercer1,*, Andrew J Copas1, Pam Sonnenberg1, Anne M Johnson1, Sally McManus2, Bob Erens2 and Jackie A Cassell3

1Centre for Sexual Health & HIV Research, Research Department of Infection & Population Health, University College London, Mortimer Market Centre, London WC1E 6JB, UK.
2National Centre for Social Research, 35 Northampton Square, London EC1V 0AX, UK.
3Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Mayfield House Room 311, University of Brighton, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9PH, UK.

*Corresponding author. Centre for Sexual Health & HIV Research, University College London, 3rd Floor – Mortimer Market Centre, Off Capper Street, London WC1E 6JB, UK. E-mail: cmercer{at}gum.ucl.ac.uk


   Abstract

Background Sexually transmitted infection (STI) risk is determined both by partner numbers and partnership characteristics. Studies describing only recent partnership(s) overestimate long-term partnerships and underestimate the contribution of casual partnerships to STI transmission in populations. We describe all heterosexual partnerships in the past year in terms of partnership type, age and geographical mixing and how these characteristics relate to condom use.

Methods Probability sample survey of 11 161 men and women aged 16–44 resident in Britain, 1999–2001. Computer-assisted self-interviews asked respondents about partner numbers and detailed questions about their three most recent partnerships. We weight these data to represent partnerships for which detailed questions were not asked to present estimates for the population of partnerships.

Results Of 15 488 heterosexuals partnerships, 39.1% (95% CI 36.6–41.7%) of men's partnerships were ‘not (yet) regular’ vs 20.0% (95% CI 18.2–21.9%) of women's partnerships. While condoms were used at last sex in 37.1% (95% CI 35.0–39.3%) of men's and 28.8% (95% CI 27.1–30.6%) of women's partnerships, and for 55.3% (95% CI 52.6–58.0%) of first sex with new partners, these proportions declined with age. When partnerships involved an age difference of 5+ years [26.2% (95% CI 23.0–29.6%) of men's and 36.5% (95% CI 33.0–40.1%) of women's partnerships], condoms were less commonly used at first sex than when partners were closer in age [44.1% (95% CI 39.1–48.4%) vs 60.8% (95% CI 57.3–64.2%)]. Sex occurred within 24 h in 23.4% (95% CI 19.7–27.5%) of men's and 10.7% (95% CI 8.3–13.6%) of women's partnerships.

Conclusions A substantial minority of partnerships in the population is casual. The proportion of partnerships not protected by condoms is high, especially for partnerships involving larger age differences and people in their 30s and 40s. Condom use with new partners needs to be promoted among all age-groups.


Keywords Sexual partners, condoms, sexual behaviour, health surveys

Accepted 2 September 2008


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
G. D. Smith
Alcohol and health: bad for you, good for you, or somewhere in between?
Int. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2009; 38(1): 1 - 2.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
J. J Valadez
Commentary: Learning to be creative with HIV/AIDS studies: looking for the variation--not only the average
Int. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2009; 38(1): 214 - 216.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.