Skip Navigation

International Journal of Epidemiology 2008 37(4):831-840; doi:10.1093/ije/dyn101
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Genser, B.
Right arrow Articles by Barreto, M. L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Genser, B.
Right arrow Articles by Barreto, M. L
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association © The Author 2008; all rights reserved.

Impact of a city-wide sanitation intervention in a large urban centre on social, environmental and behavioural determinants of childhood diarrhoea: analysis of two cohort studies

Bernd Genser1,*, Agostino Strina1, Lenaldo A dos Santos1, Carlos A Teles1, Matildes S Prado1, Sandy Cairncross2 and Mauricio L Barreto1

1 Instituto de Saúde Coletiva, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil.
2 London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

* Corresponding author. Instituto de Saúde Coletiva, Federal University of Bahia, Rua Basilio da Gama, s/n-Campus Universitario Canela, Salvador, Bahia 40.110-040, Brazil. E-mail: bernd.genser{at}bgstats.com


   Abstract

Background Poor socioeconomic status (SES) increases diarrhoea risk, mostly mediated by lack of sanitation, poor infrastructure and living conditions. The effectiveness of a city-wide sanitation intervention on diarrhoea in a large urban centre in Northeast Brazil has recently been demonstrated. This article aims to explore how this intervention altered the magnitude of relative and attributable risks of diarrhoea determinants and the pathways by which those factors affect diarrhoea risk.

Methods We investigated determinants of prevalence of diarrhoea in two cohort studies conducted before and after the intervention. Each study enrolled pre-school children followed up for 8 months. For both cohorts, we calculated relative, attributable and mediated risks of diarrhoea determinants by a hierarchical effect decomposition strategy.

Results The intervention reduced diarrhoea and also changed attributable and relative risks of diarrhoea determinants by altering the pathways of mediation. Before the intervention SES was a major distal diarrhoea determinant (attributable risk: 24%) with 90% of risk mediated by other factors, mostly by lack of sanitation and poor infrastructure (53%). After the intervention, only 13% of risk was attributed to SES, with only 42% mediated by other factors (18% by lack of sanitation and poor infrastructure).

Conclusion The intervention reduced diarrhoea risk by reducing direct exposure to unfavourable sanitation conditions. At the same time it altered the effect and mediation pathways of most distal diarrhoea determinants, especially SES. This finding corroborates the importance of public sanitation measures in reducing the impact of poverty on diarrhoea. It also underlines the value of studying the impact of public health interventions to improve our understanding of health determinants.


Keywords Diarrhoea, risk factors, sanitation interventions, developing countries, socioeconomic status, poverty, Brazil

Accepted 8 May 2008


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
S. Ebrahim
Latin America: old and new challenges
Int. J. Epidemiol., August 1, 2008; 37(4): 689 - 691.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.