IJE Advance Access originally published online on October 30, 2007
International Journal of Epidemiology 2007 36(6):1255-1264; doi:10.1093/ije/dym212
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortality differences according to living arrangements
1National Public Health Institute, Department of Health and Functional Capacity, Helsinki, Finland
2Population Research Unit, Department of Sociology, University of Helsinki, Finland
*Corresponding author. National Public Health Institute, Department of Health and Functional Capacity, Mannerheimintie 166, FIN 00300 Helsinki, Finland. E-mail: seppo.koskinen{at}ktl.fi
 |
Abstract |
|---|
Background Research has revealed mortality differences between marital status groups in different societies and different periods of time. Due to the increase in consensual unions, living alone and other changes in living arrangements, it is necessary to apply a more detailed classification of living arrangements that incorporates partnership situation and household composition.
Methods We analyse mortality by cause-of-death in the total Finnish population aged 30 or over in 1996–2000. The linked register dataset includes 15.7 million person-years and 210 139 deaths.
Results In the working aged population, cohabiters had nearly 70% excess mortality when compared with married people. Among working aged men living with someone other than a partner and among men living alone, mortality was three times higher than among married men. Among women, mortality in these groups was close to that of cohabiters. In the older population, mortality in the other groups was 15–40% higher than among married persons. Adjusting for education, social class and employment status attenuated the mortality differences by 7–31%. Having no children was associated with excess mortality in working aged women and men in each living arrangement group. The relative differences were greatest in deaths from alcohol-related causes, followed by deaths from accidents among men and working aged women and lung cancer in women.
Conclusions We observed wide mortality differences according to living arrangements, particularly among the working aged. These differences were partly explained by socioeconomic factors. Excessive alcohol use seems to be one major cause of mortality differences.
Keywords Living arrangements, marital status, mortality, cause-of-death, socioeconomic factors
Accepted 25 September 2007
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  K. Rahu, K. Parna, E. Palo, and M. Rahu Contrasts in Alcohol-Related Mortality in Estonia: Education and Ethnicity Alcohol Alcohol., September 1, 2009; 44(5): 517 - 522. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. Moustgaard and P. Martikainen Nonmarital Cohabitation Among Older Finnish Men and Women: Socioeconomic Characteristics and Forms of Union Dissolution J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci, July 1, 2009; 64B(4): 507 - 516. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. Martikainen, H. Moustgaard, M. Murphy, E. K. Einio, S. Koskinen, T. Martelin, and A. Noro Gender, Living Arrangements, and Social Circumstances as Determinants of Entry Into and Exit From Long-Term Institutional Care at Older Ages: A 6-Year Follow-Up Study of Older Finns Gerontologist, April 1, 2009; (2009) gnp013v4. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|