Skip Navigation

International Journal of Epidemiology 2007 36(1):236-241; doi:10.1093/ije/dym043
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lubin, J. H
Right arrow Articles by Rothman, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lubin, J. H
Right arrow Articles by Rothman, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association © The Author 2007; all rights reserved.

Evidence for an intensity-dependent interaction of NAT2 acetylation genotype and cigarette smoking in the Spanish Bladder Cancer Study

Jay H Lubin1,*, Manolis Kogevinas2,3, Debra Silverman4, Núria Malats3, Montserrat Garcia-Closas5, Adonina Tardón6, David W Hein7, Reina Garcia-Closas8, Consol Serra9,10, Mustafa Dosemeci4, Alfredo Carrato11 and Nathaniel Rothman4

1Biostatistics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, 6120 Executive Blvd., Rockville, Maryland 20852, USA.
2Centre for Research in Environmental Epidemiology, Municipal Institute of Medical Research (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain.
3Department of Social Medicine, Medical School, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece.
4Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, 6120 Executive Blvd., Rockville, Maryland 20852, USA.
5Hormone and Reproductive Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, 6120 Executive Blvd., Rockville, Maryland 20852, USA.
6Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain.
7Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY 40292, USA.
8Unidad de Investigación, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, La Laguna, Spain.
9Consorci Hospitalari Parc Taulí, Sabadell, Spain.
10University Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.
11Hospital General de Elche, Elche, Spain.

*Corresponding author. Biostatistics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, 6120 Executive Blvd., Rockville, Maryland 20852, USA. E-mail: lubinj{at}mail.nih.gov


   Abstract

Background The N-acetyltransferase 2 (NAT2) enzyme detoxifies aromatic amines, an important class of carcinogens in tobacco smoke. Slow acetylation phenotype individuals have reduced detoxification capacity compared with those with a rapid/intermediate phenotype. Analysis of the Spanish Bladder Cancer Study found an odds ratio (OR) for slow acetylators relative to rapid/intermediate acetylators of 0.9 in never-smokers and 1.6 in ever-smokers, a 1.8-fold enhancement in smokers. Evidence indicates that acetylation is an exposure-dependent process, and thus the magnitude of the interaction may also depend on exposure level.

Methods We extend a comprehensive three-parameter linear-exponential model for the excess odds ratio (EOR) for smoking to include effects of NAT2 status, and reanalyse smoking and NAT2 status for the bladder cancer data.

Results We show that variations in smoking risk with NAT2 status result from interactions with smoking intensity (cigarettes per day) and not total pack-years of exposure. In addition, the relative increase in smoking risk in NAT2 slo acetylators increases with smoking intensity.

Conclusions Analyses reveal an enhanced effect for smoking intensity and bladder cancer in NAT2 slow acetylators which increases with intensity.


Keywords Bladder neoplasms, smoking, dose response, interaction

Accepted 23 February 2007


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
D. Baris, M. R. Karagas, C. Verrill, A. Johnson, A. S. Andrew, C. J. Marsit, M. Schwenn, J. S. Colt, S. Cherala, C. Samanic, et al.
A Case-Control Study of Smoking and Bladder Cancer Risk: Emergent Patterns Over Time
J Natl Cancer Inst, November 18, 2009; 101(22): 1553 - 1561.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
J. H. Lubin, M. Purdue, K. Kelsey, Z.-F. Zhang, D. Winn, Q. Wei, R. Talamini, N. Szeszenia-Dabrowska, E. M. Sturgis, E. Smith, et al.
Total Exposure and Exposure Rate Effects for Alcohol and Smoking and Risk of Head and Neck Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of Case-Control Studies
Am. J. Epidemiol., October 15, 2009; 170(8): 937 - 947.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
J. H. Lubin, J. Virtamo, S. J. Weinstein, and D. Albanes
Cigarette Smoking and Cancer: Intensity Patterns in the Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta-Carotene Cancer Prevention Study in Finnish Men
Am. J. Epidemiol., April 15, 2008; 167(8): 970 - 975.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. H. Lubin, N. Caporaso, D. K. Hatsukami, A. M. Joseph, and S. S. Hecht
The Association of a Tobacco-Specific Biomarker and Cigarette Consumption and Its Dependence on Host Characteristics
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., September 1, 2007; 16(9): 1852 - 1857.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
N. Rothman, M. Garcia-Closas, and D. W Hein
Commentary: Reflections on G. M. Lower and colleagues' 1979 study associating slow acetylator phenotype with urinary bladder cancer: meta-analysis, historical refinements of the hypothesis, and lessons learned
Int. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2007; 36(1): 23 - 28.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.