Skip Navigation


IJE Advance Access originally published online on August 30, 2006
International Journal of Epidemiology 2006 35(6):1514-1521; doi:10.1093/ije/dyl197
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
35/6/1514    most recent
dyl197v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (27)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Han, J.
Right arrow Articles by Hunter, D. J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Han, J.
Right arrow Articles by Hunter, D. J
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association © The Author 2006; all rights reserved.

Article

Risk factors for skin cancers: a nested case–control study within the Nurses’ Health Study

Jiali Han1,3,*, Graham A Colditz1,2 and David J Hunter1,2,3

1 Channing Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, 181 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
2 Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
3 The Program in Molecular and Genetic Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, 665 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

* Corresponding author. Jiali Han, Channing Laboratory, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, 181 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA. E-mail: jiali.han{at}channing.harvard.edu


   Abstract

Background Constitutional factors and sun exposure are associated with skin cancer risk. However, these relations are complex and differ according to skin cancer type.

Methods We examined the associations of constitutional risk factors and sun exposure with the risks of three types of skin cancer simultaneously and evaluated the interaction between constitutional susceptibility and sun exposure in a nested case–control study within the Nurses' Health Study [200 melanoma, 275 squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and 283 basal cell carcinoma (BCC) cases, and 804 controls]. Information regarding skin cancer risk factors was obtained from the retrospective supplementary questionnaire.

Results Constitutional susceptibility was an independent risk factor for all three types of skin cancer. Sunlamp usage or tanning salon attendance was a risk factor for melanoma after adjusting for potential confounding variables (OR for ever vs never usage, 2.06, 95% CI 1.30–3.26). Higher sun exposure while wearing a bathing suit was an independent risk factor for all three types of skin cancer. We observed a significant interaction between constitutional susceptibility and sun exposure while wearing a bathing suit on melanoma risk (P, interaction, 0.03); women with the highest susceptibility and highest exposure had an OR of 8.37 (95% CI 3.07–22.84). This interaction was weaker and non-significant for SCC and BCC.

Conclusions These data largely confirm past studies on risk factors for skin cancer but provide evidence of difference on the strength of these risk factors for melanoma compared with SCC and BCC.


Keywords constitutional susceptibility, sun exposure, skin cancer

Accepted 2 August 2006


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
C. M. Olsen, H. J. Carroll, and D. C. Whiteman
Familial Melanoma: A Meta-analysis and Estimates of Attributable Fraction
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2010; 19(1): 65 - 73.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
M. B. Veierod, H.-O. Adami, E. Lund, B. K. Armstrong, and E. Weiderpass
Sun and Solarium Exposure and Melanoma Risk: Effects of Age, Pigmentary Characteristics, and Nevi
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2010; 19(1): 111 - 120.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
A. E. Cust, H. Schmid, J. A. Maskiell, J. Jetann, M. Ferguson, E. A. Holland, C. Agha-Hamilton, M. A. Jenkins, J. Kelly, R. F. Kefford, et al.
Population-based, Case-Control-Family Design to Investigate Genetic and Environmental Influences on Melanoma Risk: Australian Melanoma Family Study
Am. J. Epidemiol., December 15, 2009; 170(12): 1541 - 1554.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
O. Gefeller
Invited Commentary: Recall Bias in Melanoma--Much Ado About Almost Nothing?
Am. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2009; 169(3): 267 - 270.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
C. L. Parr, A. Hjartaker, P. Laake, E. Lund, and M. B. Veierod
Recall Bias in Melanoma Risk Factors and Measurement Error Effects: A Nested Case-Control Study Within the Norwegian Women and Cancer Study
Am. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2009; 169(3): 257 - 266.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
H. Nan, T. Niu, D. J. Hunter, and J. Han
Missense Polymorphisms in Matrix Metalloproteinase Genes and Skin Cancer Risk
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 2008; 17(12): 3551 - 3557.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
S. W Menzies
Is sun exposure a major cause of melanoma? Yes
BMJ, July 22, 2008; 337(jul22_2): a763 - a763.
[Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.