IJE Advance Access originally published online on March 23, 2006
International Journal of Epidemiology 2006 35(3):756-764; doi:10.1093/ije/dyl044
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Article |
A design for cancer casecontrol studies using only incident cases: experience with the GEM study of melanoma
1 Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
2 The University of Sydney and Cancer Council New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
3 Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Canada
4 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
5 University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
6 University of California at Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
7 Centro per la Prevenzione Oncologia Torino, Torino, Piemonte, Italy
8 British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada
9 Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria 3052, Australia
10 University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
11 University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM
* Corresponding author. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 307 E. 63rd Street, 3rd Floor, New York, NY 10021, USA. E-mail: beggc{at}mskcc.org
Background The population-based casecontrol study is not suited to the evaluation of rare genetic (or environmental) factors. The use of a novel casecontrol design in which cases have second primaries and controls are cancer survivors has been proposed for this purpose.
Methods We report results from an international study of melanoma that involved population-based ascertainment of incident cases of second or subsequent primary melanoma as the case group and incident cases of first primary melanoma as the control group. We evaluate the validity of the study design by comparing the results obtained for phenotypic factors that have been shown consistently to be associated with melanoma in previous conventional studies with the results from a conventional casecontrol study conducted in Connecticut and from literature reviews.
Results All but one of the known risk factors for melanoma were shown to be significantly associated with melanoma in our study, though the individual odds ratios appear to be somewhat attenuated relative to the magnitudes typically observed in the literature.
Conclusions Patients with a second or subsequent primary cancer of a single type represent a potentially valuable and under-utilized resource for the study of cancer aetiology.
Keywords Case-control study, case-only study, melanoma
Accepted 22 February 2006
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. Orlow, B. J. Park, U. Mujumdar, H. Patel, P. Siu-Lau, B. A. Clas, R. Downey, R. Flores, M. Bains, N. Rizk, et al. DNA Damage and Repair Capacity in Patients With Lung Cancer: Prediction of Multiple Primary Tumors J. Clin. Oncol., July 20, 2008; 26(21): 3560 - 3566. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. E. Thomas, S. N. Edmiston, A. Alexander, R. C. Millikan, P. A. Groben, H. Hao, D. Tolbert, M. Berwick, K. Busam, C. B. Begg, et al. Number of Nevi and Early-Life Ambient UV Exposure Are Associated with BRAF-Mutant Melanoma Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2007; 16(5): 991 - 997. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Kanetsky, T. R. Rebbeck, A. J. Hummer, S. Panossian, B. K. Armstrong, A. Kricker, L. D. Marrett, R. C. Millikan, S. B. Gruber, H. A. Culver, et al. Population-based study of natural variation in the melanocortin-1 receptor gene and melanoma. Cancer Res., September 15, 2006; 66(18): 9330 - 9337. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Berwick, I. Orlow, A. J. Hummer, B. K. Armstrong, A. Kricker, L. D. Marrett, R. C. Millikan, S. B. Gruber, H. Anton-Culver, R. Zanetti, et al. The Prevalence of CDKN2A Germ-Line Mutations and Relative Risk for Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma: An International Population-Based Study. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., August 1, 2006; 15(8): 1520 - 1525. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


