IJE Advance Access originally published online on August 22, 2005
International Journal of Epidemiology 2005 34(6):1319-1328; doi:10.1093/ije/dyi169
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Article |
The choice of a genetic model in the meta-analysis of molecular association studies
,*
1 Department of Health Sciences, Centre for Biostatistics and Genetic Epidemiology, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
2 Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
3 Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia
* Corresponding author. Department of Health Sciences, Centre for Biostatistics and Genetic Epidemiology, University of Leicester, 2228 Princess Road West, Leicester LE1 6TP, UK. E-mail: cm109{at}le.ac.uk
Background To evaluate genedisease associations, genetic epidemiologists collect information on the disease risk in subjects with different genotypes (for a bi-allelic polymorphism: gg, Gg, GG). Meta-analyses of such studies usually reduce the problem to a single comparison, either by performing two separate pairwise comparisons or by assuming a specific underlying genetic model (recessive, co-dominant, dominant). A biological justification for the choice of the genetic model is seldom available.
Methods We present a genetic model-free approach, which does not assume that the underlying genetic model is known in advance but still makes use of the information available on all genotypes. The approach uses ORGG, the odds ratio between the homozygous genotypes, to capture the magnitude of the genetic effect, and
, the heterozygote log odds ratio as a proportion of the homozygote log odds ratio, to capture the genetic mode of inheritance. The analysis assumes that the same unknown genetic model, i.e. the same
, applies in all studies, and this is investigated graphically. The approach is illustrated using five examples of published meta-analyses.
Results Analyses based on specific genetic models can produce misleading estimates of the odds ratios when an inappropriate model is assumed. The genetic model-free approach gives appropriately wider confidence intervals than genetic model-based analyses because it allows for uncertainty about the genetic model. In terms of assessment of model fit, it performs at least as well as a bivariate pairwise analysis in our examples.
Conclusions The genetic model-free approach offers a unified approach that efficiently estimates the genetic effect and the underlying genetic model. A bivariate pairwise analysis should be used if the assumption of a common genetic model across studies is in doubt.
Keywords Meta-analysis, population genetics, polymorphism, genetic models, association studies
Accepted 25 July 2005
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Minelli, J. R. Thompson, K. R. Abrams, A. Thakkinstian, and J. Attia The Quality of Meta-Analyses of Genetic Association Studies: A Review With Recommendations Am. J. Epidemiol., December 1, 2009; 170(11): 1333 - 1343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Salanti, L. Southam, D. Altshuler, K. Ardlie, I. Barroso, M. Boehnke, M. C. Cornelis, T. M. Frayling, H. Grallert, N. Grarup, et al. Underlying Genetic Models of Inheritance in Established Type 2 Diabetes Associations Am. J. Epidemiol., September 1, 2009; 170(5): 537 - 545. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. G. Bagos Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 4G/5G and 5,10-methylene-tetrahydrofolate reductase C677T polymorphisms in polycystic ovary syndrome Mol. Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2009; 15(1): 19 - 26. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. S. Sagoo, I. Tatt, G. Salanti, A. S. Butterworth, N. Sarwar, M. van Maarle, J. W. Jukema, B. Wiman, J. J. P. Kastelein, A. M. Bennet, et al. Seven Lipoprotein Lipase Gene Polymorphisms, Lipid Fractions, and Coronary Disease: A HuGE Association Review and Meta-Analysis Am. J. Epidemiol., December 1, 2008; 168(11): 1233 - 1246. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Schunkert, A. Gotz, P. Braund, R. McGinnis, D.-A. Tregouet, M. Mangino, P. Linsel-Nitschke, F. Cambien, C. Hengstenberg, K. Stark, et al. Repeated Replication and a Prospective Meta-Analysis of the Association Between Chromosome 9p21.3 and Coronary Artery Disease Circulation, April 1, 2008; 117(13): 1675 - 1684. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Thakkinstian, S. Bowe, M. McEvoy, W. Smith, and J. Attia Association between Apolipoprotein E Polymorphisms and Age-related Macular Degeneration: A HuGE Review and Meta-Analysis Am. J. Epidemiol., November 1, 2006; 164(9): 813 - 822. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Thakkinstian, P. Han, M. McEvoy, W. Smith, J. Hoh, K. Magnusson, K. Zhang, and J. Attia Systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between complementary factor H Y402H polymorphisms and age-related macular degeneration Hum. Mol. Genet., September 15, 2006; 15(18): 2784 - 2790. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



