Skip Navigation


IJE Advance Access originally published online on April 25, 2005
International Journal of Epidemiology 2005 34(4):846-852; doi:10.1093/ije/dyi085
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
34/4/846    most recent
dyi085v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Qin, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Qin, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association © The Author 2005; all rights reserved.

Article

Suicide risk in relation to level of urbanicity—a population-based linkage study

Ping Qin

National Centre for Register-based Research, University of Aarhus, Taasingegade 1, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark. E-mail: pq{at}ncrr.dk

Background The extent to which the high suicide rate in urban areas is influenced by exposures to risk factors for suicide other than urbanicity remains unknown. This population-based study aims to investigate suicide risk in relation to the level of urbanicity in the context of other factors, and to study the risk variation in a sex, age, and calendar year perspective.

Methods The study is a nested case–control study comprising 21 169 suicides and 423 128 population controls matched for age and sex. Personal data on place of residence, socioeconomic status and psychiatric history were retrieved from various Danish longitudinal registers. Data were analysed with conditional logistic regression.

Results This study confirms that people living in more urbanized areas are at a higher risk of suicide than their counterparts in less urbanized areas. However, this excess risk is largely eliminated when adjusted for personal marital, income, and ethnic differences; it is even reversed when further adjusted for psychiatric status. Moreover, the impact of urbanicity on suicide risk differs significantly by sex and across age. Urban living reduces suicide risk significantly among men, especially young men, but increases the risk among women, especially women aged 24–35 or >65 years. In addition, during 1981–1997, the suicide risk associated with urbanicity remained rather constant among women, whereas it dropped significantly among men, a trend that seemingly gained strength during the last part of this period.

Conclusions Suicide risk associated with urbanicity varies significantly by sex and age groups and recent years have seen a decline in the urban–rural disparities among men. The increased risk in urban areas can largely be explained by the effects of marital status, ethnics, income, and psychiatric status.


Keywords Suicide, level of urbanicity, risk factors, nested case–control design, population registers

Accepted 21 March 2005


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J Public HealthHome page
A. R. Andres, S. Collings, and P. Qin
Sex-specific impact of socio-economic factors on suicide risk: a population-based case-control study in Denmark
Eur J Public Health, November 23, 2009; (2009) ckp183v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Inj. Prev.Home page
R. M Bossarte and E. D Caine
Increase in US youth suicide rates 2004
Inj. Prev., February 1, 2008; 14(1): 2 - 3.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.