IJE Advance Access originally published online on March 31, 2005
International Journal of Epidemiology 2005 34(3):680-687; doi:10.1093/ije/dyi060
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Methodology |
Proper interpretation of non-differential misclassification effects: expectations vs observations
1 Division of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455–0392, USA
2 Department of Epidemiology and Department of Statistics, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
* Corresponding author. Community Health Department, Utah Valley State College, Orem, UT 84058, USA. E-mail:jurekan{at}uvsc.edu
Background Many investigators write as if non-differential exposure misclassification inevitably leads to a reduction in the strength of an estimated exposure–disease association. Unfortunately, non-differentiality alone is insufficient to guarantee bias towards the null. Furthermore, because bias refers to the average estimate across study repetitions rather than the result of a single study, bias towards the null is insufficient to guarantee that an observed estimate will be an underestimate. Thus, as noted before, exposure misclassification can spuriously increase the observed strength of an association even when the misclassification process is non-differential and the bias it produced is towards the null.
Methods We present additional results on this topic, including a simulation study of how often an observed relative risk is an overestimate of the true relative risk when the bias is towards the null.
Results The frequency of overestimation depends on many factors: the value of the true relative risk, exposure prevalence, baseline (unexposed) risk, misclassification rates, and other factors that influence bias and random error.
Conclusions Non-differentiality of exposure misclassification does not justify claims that the observed estimate must be an underestimate; further conditions must hold to get bias towards the null, and even when they do hold the observed estimate may by chance be an overestimate.
Keywords Bias, epidemiological methods, misclassification, non-differential, relative risk
Accepted 14 February 2005
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  D. McGeoghegan, K. Binks, M. Gillies, S. Jones, and S. Whaley The non-cancer mortality experience of male workers at British Nuclear Fuels plc, 1946-2005 Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2008; 37(3): 506 - 518. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. M Jurek, S. Greenland, and G. Maldonado Brief Report: How far from non-differential does exposure or disease misclassification have to be to bias measures of association away from the null? Int. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2008; 37(2): 382 - 385. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Z. Fewell, G. Davey Smith, and J. A. C. Sterne The Impact of Residual and Unmeasured Confounding in Epidemiologic Studies: A Simulation Study Am. J. Epidemiol., September 15, 2007; 166(6): 646 - 655. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 X. Jiang, J.-M. Yuan, P. L. Skipper, S. R. Tannenbaum, and M. C. Yu Environmental Tobacco Smoke and Bladder Cancer Risk in Never Smokers of Los Angeles County Cancer Res., August 1, 2007; 67(15): 7540 - 7545. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Posner, M. A. Oquendo, M. Gould, B. Stanley, and M. Davies Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA): Classification of Suicidal Events in the FDA's Pediatric Suicidal Risk Analysis of Antidepressants Am J Psychiatry, July 1, 2007; 164(7): 1035 - 1043. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 V. Ehrenstein, L. Pedersen, V. Holsteen, H. Larsen, K. J. Rothman, and H. T. Sorensen Postterm Delivery and Risk for Epilepsy in Childhood Pediatrics, March 1, 2007; 119(3): e554 - e561. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. CHARBOTEL, J. FEVOTTE, M. HOURS, J.-L. MARTIN, and A. BERGERET Case-Control Study on Renal Cell Cancer and Occupational Exposure to Trichloroethylene. Part II: Epidemiological Aspects Ann. Hyg., November 1, 2006; 50(8): 777 - 787. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Greenland and P. Gustafson Accounting for Independent Nondifferential Misclassification Does Not Increase Certainty that an Observed Association Is in the Correct Direction Am. J. Epidemiol., July 1, 2006; 164(1): 63 - 68. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Shen, M. B. Terry, M. D. Gammon, M. M. Gaudet, S. L. Teitelbaum, S. M. Eng, S. K. Sagiv, A. I. Neugut, and R. M. Santella MGMT genotype modulates the associations between cigarette smoking, dietary antioxidants and breast cancer risk Carcinogenesis, December 1, 2005; 26(12): 2131 - 2137. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. P Fox, T. L Lash, and S. Greenland A method to automate probabilistic sensitivity analyses of misclassified binary variables Int. J. Epidemiol., December 1, 2005; 34(6): 1370 - 1376. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. D. Smith Infection, medical care and inequalities Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2005; 34(3): 507 - 508. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|