Skip Navigation


IJE Advance Access originally published online on June 24, 2004
International Journal of Epidemiology 2004 33(5):1138-1143; doi:10.1093/ije/dyh250
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
33/5/1138    most recent
dyh250v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Durie, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Durie, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

IJE vol.33 no.5 © International Epidemiological Association 2004; all rights reserved.

Article

Understanding health and illness: research at the interface between science and indigenous knowledge{dagger}

Mason Durie

Te Putahi a Toi, School of Maori Studies, Massey University, New Zealand

Correspondence: Mason Durie, Te Putahi a Toi, School of Maori Studies, Massey University, New Zealand. E-mail: m.h.durie{at}massey.ac.nz

Indigenous knowledge cannot be verified by scientific criteria nor can science be adequately assessed according to the tenets of indigenous knowledge. Each is built on distinctive philosophies, methodologies, and criteria. While there is considerable debate around their relative merits, contests about the validities of the two systems tend to serve as distractions from explorations of the interface, and the subsequent opportunities for creating new knowledge that reflects the dual persuasions. Maori researchers in Aotearoa/New Zealand have been able to apply the methods and values of both systems in order to reach more comprehensive understandings of health and illness. Two case studies are used to demonstrate how the incorporation of indigenous beliefs into research protocols and measurements can enhance health research and understandings of health and illness.

Accepted 10 May 2004


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am. J. Public HealthHome page
C. A.M. Richmond, N. A. Ross, and G. M. Egeland
Social Support and Thriving Health: A New Approach to Understanding the Health of Indigenous Canadians
Am J Public Health, October 1, 2007; 97(10): 1827 - 1833.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Int J Qual Health CareHome page
S. Hurst and P. Nader
Building community involvement in cross-cultural Indigenous health programs
Int. J. Qual. Health Care, August 1, 2006; 18(4): 294 - 298.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Int J EpidemiolHome page
G. DAVEY SMITH
Cultural climate, physical climate, life, and death
Int. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2006; 35(2): 211 - 212.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Int J EpidemiolHome page
G. Davey Smith
Genetic epidemiology: an 'enlightened narrative'?
Int. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2004; 33(5): 923 - 924.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.