Skip Navigation


IJE Advance Access originally published online on March 11, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
33/3/469    most recent
dyh096v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Milligan, P.
Right arrow Articles by Bennett, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Milligan, P.
Right arrow Articles by Bennett, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal of Epidemiology, Volume 33, Number 3, pp. 469-476
IJE vol.33 no.3 © International Epidemiological Association 2004; all rights reserved.


Special Theme: Methodology

Comparison of two cluster sampling methods for health surveys in developing countries

Paul Milligan1, Alpha Njie2 and Steve Bennett3

1 MRC Laboratories, The Gambia
2 Department of State for Health and Social Welfare, Government of The Gambia
3 MRC Tropical Epidemiology Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK

Correspondence: Paul Milligan, MRC Laboratories, PO Box 273, Fajara, The Gambia. E mail: pmilligan{at}mrc.gm

Background The Expanded Program for Immunization (EPI) random walk method has been widely used by the World Health Organization and others for rapid cluster sample surveys where an up-to-date household sampling frame is not available. However, it is not a probability sample, does not allow for population movement since the last census, and does not ensure objectivity in household selection or permit call-backs for non-response. Compact segment sampling avoids these problems and has been proposed as a slower but cleaner alternative.

Methods We conducted two surveys, one using the EPI scheme and one using compact segment sampling, to estimate vaccination coverage in Western Region of The Gambia within 3 months of each other in 2000–2001.

Results Point estimates for vaccination coverage from the two surveys rarely differed by more than 2%. Any differences were more likely to be due to household selection than to population movement. A simple mathematical model showed that even in extreme situations, ignoring population movement since the last census is unlikely to have any appreciable effect. Rates of homogeneity did not differ systematically between the surveys.

Conclusions In situations where quality of fieldwork can be guaranteed, the EPI random walk method can give accurate and precise results. However, compact segment sampling is generally to be preferred as it ensures objectivity in household selection and permits the estimation of population totals (such as those unvaccinated), which are helpful for planning service provision.


Keywords Cluster sampling, Expanded Program for Immunization, segment sampling, survey methods, vaccination coverage

Accepted 15 December 2003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Public Opin QHome page
D. A. Marker
The Polls--Review: Methodological Review of "Mortality After the 2003 Invasion of Iraq: A Cross-Sectional Cluster Sample Survey"
Public Opin Q, June 1, 2008; 72(2): 345 - 363.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
H. Limburg, F. B. von-Bischhoffshausen, P. Gomez, J. C. Silva, and A. Foster
Review of recent surveys on blindness and visual impairment in Latin America
Br. J. Ophthalmol., March 1, 2008; 92(3): 315 - 319.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
C. Eusebio, H. Kuper, S. Polack, J. Enconado, N. Tongson, D. Dionio, A. DumDum, H. Limburg, and A. Foster
Rapid assessment of avoidable blindness in Negros Island and Antique District, Philippines
Br. J. Ophthalmol., December 1, 2007; 91(12): 1588 - 1592.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
Z. Kosa, G. Szeles, L. Kardos, K. Kosa, R. Nemeth, S. Orszagh, G. Fesus, M. McKee, R. Adany, and Z. Voko
A Comparative Health Survey of the Inhabitants of Roma Settlements in Hungary
Am J Public Health, May 1, 2007; 97(5): 853 - 859.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
Z Wadud, H Kuper, S Polack, R Lindfield, M R Akm, K A Choudhury, T Lindfield, H Limburg, and A Foster
Rapid assessment of avoidable blindness and needs assessment of cataract surgical services in Satkhira District, Bangladesh
Br. J. Ophthalmol., October 1, 2006; 90(10): 1225 - 1229.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Policy PlanHome page
J. Cassell, M Leach, J. Fairhead, M Small, and C. Mercer
The social shaping of childhood vaccination practice in rural and urban Gambia.
Health Policy Plan., September 1, 2006; 21(5): 373 - 391.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.