IJE Advance Access originally published online on March 11, 2004
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
International Journal of Epidemiology, Volume 33, Number 3, pp. 469-476
IJE vol.33 no.3 © International Epidemiological Association 2004; all rights reserved.
Special Theme: Methodology |
Comparison of two cluster sampling methods for health surveys in developing countries
1 MRC Laboratories, The Gambia
2 Department of State for Health and Social Welfare, Government of The Gambia
3 MRC Tropical Epidemiology Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
Correspondence: Paul Milligan, MRC Laboratories, PO Box 273, Fajara, The Gambia. E mail: pmilligan{at}mrc.gm
Background The Expanded Program for Immunization (EPI) random walk method has been widely used by the World Health Organization and others for rapid cluster sample surveys where an up-to-date household sampling frame is not available. However, it is not a probability sample, does not allow for population movement since the last census, and does not ensure objectivity in household selection or permit call-backs for non-response. Compact segment sampling avoids these problems and has been proposed as a slower but cleaner alternative.
Methods We conducted two surveys, one using the EPI scheme and one using compact segment sampling, to estimate vaccination coverage in Western Region of The Gambia within 3 months of each other in 20002001.
Results Point estimates for vaccination coverage from the two surveys rarely differed by more than 2%. Any differences were more likely to be due to household selection than to population movement. A simple mathematical model showed that even in extreme situations, ignoring population movement since the last census is unlikely to have any appreciable effect. Rates of homogeneity did not differ systematically between the surveys.
Conclusions In situations where quality of fieldwork can be guaranteed, the EPI random walk method can give accurate and precise results. However, compact segment sampling is generally to be preferred as it ensures objectivity in household selection and permits the estimation of population totals (such as those unvaccinated), which are helpful for planning service provision.
Keywords Cluster sampling, Expanded Program for Immunization, segment sampling, survey methods, vaccination coverage
Accepted 15 December 2003
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. A. Marker The Polls--Review: Methodological Review of "Mortality After the 2003 Invasion of Iraq: A Cross-Sectional Cluster Sample Survey" Public Opin Q, June 1, 2008; 72(2): 345 - 363. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Limburg, F. B. von-Bischhoffshausen, P. Gomez, J. C. Silva, and A. Foster Review of recent surveys on blindness and visual impairment in Latin America Br. J. Ophthalmol., March 1, 2008; 92(3): 315 - 319. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Eusebio, H. Kuper, S. Polack, J. Enconado, N. Tongson, D. Dionio, A. DumDum, H. Limburg, and A. Foster Rapid assessment of avoidable blindness in Negros Island and Antique District, Philippines Br. J. Ophthalmol., December 1, 2007; 91(12): 1588 - 1592. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Kosa, G. Szeles, L. Kardos, K. Kosa, R. Nemeth, S. Orszagh, G. Fesus, M. McKee, R. Adany, and Z. Voko A Comparative Health Survey of the Inhabitants of Roma Settlements in Hungary Am J Public Health, May 1, 2007; 97(5): 853 - 859. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z Wadud, H Kuper, S Polack, R Lindfield, M R Akm, K A Choudhury, T Lindfield, H Limburg, and A Foster Rapid assessment of avoidable blindness and needs assessment of cataract surgical services in Satkhira District, Bangladesh Br. J. Ophthalmol., October 1, 2006; 90(10): 1225 - 1229. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Cassell, M Leach, J. Fairhead, M Small, and C. Mercer The social shaping of childhood vaccination practice in rural and urban Gambia. Health Policy Plan., September 1, 2006; 21(5): 373 - 391. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



