Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aekplakorn, W.
Right arrow Articles by Vitayanon, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aekplakorn, W.
Right arrow Articles by Vitayanon, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal of Epidemiology 2003;32:854-861
© International Epidemiological Association 2003


Respiratory

Acute effect of sulphur dioxide from a power plant on pulmonary function of children, Thailand

Wichai Aekplakorn1, Dana Loomis2, Nuntavarn Vichit-Vadakan3, Carl Shy2, Somkiat Wongtim4 and Paipun Vitayanon3

1 Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Rama 6 Road, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.
2 Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, CB-7435 UNC-CH, Chapel Hill NC 27599–7435 USA.
3 College of Public Health, Chulalongkorn University, Floor 10th, Building 3, Soi Chula 62, Payathai Road, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
4 Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Rama 4 Road, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.

Wichai Aekplakorn, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Rama 6 Road, Bangkok 10400, Thailand. E-mail address: rawap{at}mahidol.ac.th

Background Epidemiological studies have shown reversible declines of lung function in response to air pollution, but research on the independent effect of short-term exposure to ambient sulphur dioxide (SO2) on pulmonary function is limited. This study evaluated the association of short-term exposure to increased ambient SO2 and daily pulmonary function changes among children with and without asthma.

Methods The associations of daily exposure to SO2 and particulate matter 10 µm in diameter (PM10) with pulmonary function were examined in 175 asthmatic and non-asthmatic children aged 6–14 years who resided near a coal-fired power plant in Thailand. Each child performed daily pulmonary function tests during the 61-day study period. General linear mixed models were used to estimate the association of air pollution and pulmonary function controlling for time, temperature, co-pollutants, and autocorrelation.

Results In the asthmatic children, a daily increase in SO2 was associated with negligible declines in pulmonary function, but a small negative association was found between PM10 and pulmonary function. A 10-µg/m3 increment was associated with changes in the highest forced vital capacity (FVC) (–6.3 ml, 95% CI: –9.8, –2.8), forced expiratory volume at 1 second (FEV1) (-6.0 ml, 95% CI: -9.2, 2.7), peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) (-18.9 ml.sec-1, 95% CI: -28.5, -9.3) and forced expiratory flow 25 to 75% of the FVC (FEF25-75%) (-3.7 ml.sec-1, 95% CI: -10.9, 3.5). No consistent associations between air pollution and pulmonary function were found for non-asthmatic children.

Conclusion Declines in pulmonary function among asthmatic children were associated with increases in particulate air pollution, rather than with increases in SO2.


Keywords SO2, particulate air pollution, pulmonary function, epidemiology, Thailand

Accepted 14 May 2003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J Public HealthHome page
U. Langkulsen, W. Jinsart, K. Karita, and E. Yano
Respiratory symptoms and lung function in Bangkok school children
Eur J Public Health, December 1, 2006; 16(6): 676 - 681.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.